Paper Titles
Compaction of Ti-6Al-4V Powder by ECAE with Back-Pressure
p.33
Optimising the Model of Gas-Jet Quenching of a Carburised Gear
p.37
Metallurgical Nature at the Interface between Tool Shoulder and Workpiece during Friction Stir Welding
p.43
Multifarious Fracture Features of CuZrAlGd(Ag) Bulk Metallic Glasses
p.47
Biomechanical and Biocorrosion Properties of Nanostructured Titanium
p.51
Characterization of Indentation Size Effect of Hardness Using a Loading Curve from Crystalline Materials
p.55
The Effect of Additives and Substrate Conditions on the Copper Electrodeposition for Thin Film Applications
p.59
Surface Characteristics of the Anodized and Hydrothermally Treated Titanium Affected by the Current Density, Voltage, and Time
p.63
Surface Characterization of an Extruded 6060 Al Alloy
p.67

Biomechanical and Biocorrosion Properties of Nanostructured Titanium

Article Preview

Abstract:

The nanostructured titanium was fabricated via the surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) process and the effect of nano-crystalline structure on the biomechanical and biocorrosion properties were studied. It was found that the Young’s modulus of nanostructured Ti decreased significantly and thus the biomechanical property was improved. The electrochemical results revealed that the corrosion resistance of Ti became worse after SMAT process, which is contributed to the higher activation of the nanostructured surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Advanced Materials and Processing IV View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 29-30)

Pages:

51-54

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.29-30.51

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2007

Authors:

X.N. Zhang

Keywords:

Biocorrosion, Biomechanical, Nanostructure, Titanium (Ti)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] M. Niinomi, Metall. Mater. Trans. 33A (2002), p.477.

Google Scholar

[2] G. He, J. Eckert, Q. L. Dai, M. L. Sui, W. Loser, M. Hagiwara, E. Ma. Biomaterials 24 (2003), p.5115.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Saito, T. Furuta, J. H. Hwang, S. Kuramoto, et al., Science300 (2003), p.464.

Google Scholar

[4] V. Latysh, G. Krallics, I. Alexandrov, A. Fodor, Current Appl. Phys. 6 (2006), p.262.

Google Scholar

[5] X. J. Wu, L. G. Du, H. F. Zhang, J. F. Liu, Y. S. Zhou, Z. Q. Li, L. Y. Xiong, Y. L. Bai, Nanostru. Mater. 12 (1999), p.221.

Google Scholar

[6] G. W. Nieman, J. R. Weertman, R. W. Siegel, J. Mater. Res. 6 (1991), p.1012.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Korn, R. Birringer, H. Gleiter, A. Morsch, W. Arnold, J. Phys. Colloq. 49 (1988), p.769.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Lu, J. Lu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 375-377 (2004), p.38.

Google Scholar

[9] W. P. Tong, N. R. Tao, Z. B. Wang, J. Lu, K. Lu, Science299 (2003), p.686.

Google Scholar

[10] N. R. Tao, W. P. Tong, Z. B. Wang, W. Wang, M. L. Sui, J. Lu, K. Lu, J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 19(2003), p.563.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Y. Zhu, A. Vassel, F. Brisset, K. Lu, J. Lu, Acta Mater. 52 (2004), p.4101.

Google Scholar

[12] Z. Chen, M. He, B. Balakrisnan, C. C. Chum., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 423 (2006), p.107.

Google Scholar