Development of Orthotropic Beam Element Using a Consistent Higher Order Deformation Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to analyze beam structures more accurately and effectively, a two-node orthotropic beam element is proposed. This beam element is formulated using a consistent higher order deformation theory of orthotropic beams of which the transverse normal deformation can be effectively estimated. The stiffness matrix and the vector of equivalent nodal forces of the beam element are derived explicitly by the Galerkin method. In order to examine the reliability and the characteristics of the beam element, the analytical and the finite element solutions of a simple cantilevered beam are compared with each other. As a result, the following conclusions are obtained; (1) the accuracy of the suggested orthotropic beam element is very excellent and so the transverse normal deformation and shear stress of an orthotropic beam can be effectively estimated. (2) It can be used for accurately analyzing the general beam structures regardless of the Euler's or the Timoshenko's beam.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Pages:

519-524

Citation:

Online since:

April 2004

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Reisman and P. S. Pawlik: Elasticity Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1980).

Google Scholar

[2] R. D Cook, D. S. Malkus, and M. E. Plesha: Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York (1989).

Google Scholar

[3] R. H. MacNeal: Finite Elements Their Design and Performance, Marcel Dekker, New York (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Tessler and S. B Dong, Computers & Structures 14 (1981) p.335.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Stolarski and T. Belytschko, J. Applied Mechanics 49 (1982) p.172.

Google Scholar

[6] D. S. Malkus and T. JR. Hughes, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 15 (1978) p.68.

Google Scholar

[7] A . Tessler, Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering 32 (1991) p.1027.

Google Scholar

[8] S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier: Theory of Elasticity, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1982).

Google Scholar

[9] A. Tessler and E. Saether, Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering 31 (1991) p.1069.

Google Scholar

[10] J. K. Lim and S.Y. Han, JSME Int. J. (A) 44, (2001) pp.370-1.

Google Scholar

1 4 0 max 11 lq IvE.

Google Scholar

5 Ratio of the cross section height over length, h/l.

Google Scholar