Paper Titles
Bonelike®/PLGA Hybrid Materials for Bone Regeneration: In Vivo Evaluation
p.374
Effect of Human Serum Proteins on Pure Hydroxyapatite and Silicon Substituted Hydroxyapatatite: AFM and SEM Studies
p.378
Network Connectivity and Bio-Mineralization of 0.45SiO2–(0.45-x)MgO–xK2O–0.1(3CaO:P2O5) Glasses
p.383
Synthesis and Characterization of Amorphous Silica Modified with Organic Ligands
p.388
Mechanical Characterization of Dental Restorative Composite Materials
p.393
Protein Adsorption Effect on In Vitro Acellular Biodegradation of CaO-P2O5 Glass Ceramics
p.398
Early Steps of Orthophosphate Crystallisation in a Ca-Mg-K Phosphosilicate Glass Frit
p.402
Bioinspired Macromolecular Actuators
p.406
A Piezoelectric Pseudo-Composite Polymer Film for the Detection of Proteins
p.411

Mechanical Characterization of Dental Restorative Composite Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Advanced Materials Forum II View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 455-456)

Pages:

393-397

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.455-456.393

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2004

Authors:

P. Vale Antunes, Amilcar Ramalho

Keywords:

Biomaterial, Contact-Fatigue, Elasticity Modulus, Flexural Resistance, Hardness, Restorative Composites

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] ASTM: Standard test method for Flexural strength of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature C1161 (1996), p.304.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Braem, P. Lambrechts, V. Van Doren and G. Vanherle: J. Dent. Res. Vol 65 (1986) p.648.

DOI: 10.1177/00220345860650050301

Google Scholar

[3] ASTM: Standard test method for Dynamic Young´s modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson´s ratio for advanced ceramics by impulse excitation of vibration C1259 (1996), p.374.

DOI: 10.1520/c1259

Google Scholar

[4] J. Sabbagh, J. Vreven and G. Leloup: Mat. Vol. 18 (2002), p.64.

Google Scholar

[5] G.R. Craig and F. A. Peyton: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 37 (1958), pp.710-8.

Google Scholar

[6] I. M. Peterson, A. Pajares, B. R. Lawn V.P. Thompson and E. D. Rekow: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 77 (4) (1998), p.589. Fig. 2. Typical damage, ring cracks near the limits of the contact depression, composite E, 1. 2x10 5 loading cycles, of 400 N.

Google Scholar