Grain Growth Microstructures as Indicators of Sample Evolution

Article Preview

Abstract:

Grain growth simulations using the microstructure simulation system Elle have been performed in materials with a pre-existing grain shape preferred orientation. As might be expected, the microstructure is completely modified by the end of the experiment, and grain areas have increased by a factor of seven. The area of material swept by the migrating grain boundaries was monitored, and it was found that at every stage, virtually all of the grains which survived the grain growth process contain one and only one core of unswept material. Remarkably these remnant unswept cores preserve a useable record of the grain size and orientation of the original grains. This work suggests that it may be possible to see past a grain growth episode to estimate the original grain shape and grain size of the polycrystal, and perhaps even reconstruct the grain boundary kinematics. The identification of unswept cores also has the potential to help unravel the evolution of grain boundary chemistry during grain boundary migration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 467-470)

Pages:

1051-1056

Citation:

Online since:

October 2004

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Evans, J. Renner and G. Hirth: International Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 90, (2001), pp.88-103.

Google Scholar

[2] J.L. Urai, W.D. Means and G.S. Lister: AGU Geophysical Monograph, Vol. 36, (1986), pp.161-199.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Reinecke, H. -J. Bernhardt, and T. Wirth: Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Vol. 139, (2000), pp.584-606.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.U. Mishin, and I.M. Razumovski: Acta metall. mater. Vol. 40, (1992), p.839.

Google Scholar

[5] M.W. Jessell, P.D. Bons, L. Evans, T.D. Barr, and K. Stüwe: Computers and Geosciences, Vol. 27, (2001), pp.17-30.

DOI: 10.1016/s0098-3004(00)00061-3

Google Scholar

[6] P.D. Bons, M.W. Jessell, L. Evans, T.D. Barr, and K. Stüwe: In: Tectonic Modeling: a Volume in Honor of Hans Ramberg, Memoir 193 (eds Koyi, H. A. & Mancktelow, N. S. ), (2000), pp.45-49. Geological Society of America, Boulder Co.

DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-1193-2.39

Google Scholar

[7] S. Piazolo, P.D. Bons, M.W. Jessell, L. Evans, and C.W. Passchier: In: Deformation Mechanisms, Rheology and Tectonics: Current Status and Future Perspectives, Special Publication, 200 (eds De Meer, S., Drury, M. D., De Bresser, J. H. P. & Pennock, G. M. ), (2002).

DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2001.200.01.01

Google Scholar

[8] S. Piazolo, M.W. Jessell, P.D. Bons and L. Evans: Journal of the Virtual Explorer 4. http: /virtualexplorer. com. au/2001/Volume4/. (2001).

Google Scholar

[9] P.D. Bons, & J.L. Urai : Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 14, (1992), pp.1101-1109.

Google Scholar

[10] M.B. Holness, and G.R. Watt:. Geofluids, Vol. 1, (2001), pp.215-228.

Google Scholar

[11] M.W. Jessell, O. Kostenko, and B. Jamtveit: J. metamorphic Geol., Vol. 21, (2003), pp.481-491.

Google Scholar

[12] J.L. Urai, C.J. Spiers, H.J. Zwart, and G.S. Lister: Nature, Vol. 324, (1986), pp.554-557.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Sheikh-Ali, D.A. Molodov and H. Garmestani: Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 82, (2003), pp.3005-3007.

Google Scholar