Grain-Size Effects and the Physical Properties of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3-δ

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of grain-size in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3-δ (LCMO) system have been studied in connection with the magnetic and electronic properties. LCMO system prepared by the solid-state reaction was annealed in air at 1200, 1300 and 1400°C. The grain sizes of LCMO samples become larger with increasing of annealing temperature (TA ). The magnetization in LCMO samples increased while the coercive field decreased with increasing TA. The conductivity increased and the metal-insulator transition temperature TM-I decreased with increasing of TA. These physical properties are due to the oxygen deficiency caused by the increase of grain size. Finally, it was found that the grain size and the mechanical connection between grains play an important role in determining the electronic and magnetic properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 277-279)

Pages:

929-934

Citation:

Online since:

January 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Z. Sun, W. J. Gallagher, P. R. Duncombe, L. Krusin-Elbaum, R. A. Aliman, A. Gupta, Y. Lu, G. Q. gong, and G. Xiao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3266 (1996).

DOI: 10.1063/1.118031

Google Scholar

[2] S. Jin, T. H. Tiefel, M. McCormarck, R. A. Faastnacht, R. Ramesh, and L. H. Chen, Science 264, 413 (1994).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Y. Hwang, S-W. Cheong, N. P. Ong, and B. Batlogg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2041(1996).

Google Scholar

[4] J. F. Mitchell, D. N. Argyriou, C. D. Potter, D. G. Hinks, J. D. Jorgensen, and S. D. Bader, Phys. Rev. B 54, 6172 (1996).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Niebieskikwiat, R. D. Sanchez, A. Caneiro, and B. Alascio, Rev. B 63, 212402 (2001).

Google Scholar

[6] H. L. Ju, C. Kwon, Q. Li, R. L. Greene, and T. Venkatesan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2108 (1994).

Google Scholar

[7] A. Gupta, T. R. McGuire, P. R. Duncombe, M. Rupp, J. Z. Sun, W. J. Gallagher, and G. Xiao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 3494 (1995).

Google Scholar

[8] M. F. Hundley, M. Hawley, R. H. Heffner, Q. X. Jia, J. J. Neumeier, J. Tesmer, J. D. Thompson, and X. D. Wu, Appl. Phy. Lett. 67, 3494 (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] X. L. Wang, S. X. Dou, H. K. Liu, m. Ionescu, and B. Zeimetz, Appl. Phy. Lett. 73, 396 (1998).

Google Scholar

[10] B. Martinez, L. I. Balcells, J. Fontcuberta, X. Obradors, C. H. Cohenca, and R. F. Jardim, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 7058 (1998).

Google Scholar

[11] H. Y. Hwang, S. -W. Cheong, N. P. Ong, and B. Batogg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2041 (1996).

Google Scholar

[12] N. Zhang, W. P. Ding, W. Zhong, D. Y. Xing, and Y. W. Du, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8138 (1997).

Google Scholar

[13] K. -I. Kobayashi, T. Kimura, H. Sawada, K. Terakura, and Y. Tokura, Nature 395, 677 (1998).

Google Scholar

[14] E. S. Vlakhov, R. A. Chakalova, K. A. Nenkov, K. Dörr, A. Handstein, and K. -H. Müller, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 2152 (1998).

Google Scholar

[15] C. L. Yuan, S. G. Wang, W. H. song, T. Yu, J. m. Dai, S. L. Ye, and Y. P. Sun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3853 (1999). Title of Publication (to be inserted by the publisher).

Google Scholar

[16] C. L. Yuan, S. G. Wang, W. H. song, T. Yu, J. m. Dai, S. L. Ye, and Y. P. Sun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3853 (1999).

Google Scholar

[17] Srinivas V. Pietambaram, D. Kumar, Rajiv K. Singh, C. B. Lee, Mat. Res. Soc. 167, J3. 14. 1(2000).

Google Scholar

[18] Y. S. Lee, V. G. Prokhorov, H. J. Shin, and Y. P. Lee, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 196, 70 (2003).

Google Scholar