Slag Cleaning Processes: A Growing Concern

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the last two decades copper metallurgy has faced tough challenges to comply with environmental regulations and falling copper prices. Although in the last months copper price has increased, still the environmental issue and operation related costs remain and as long as foreseen they will continue to do so. To reduce emissions to the atmosphere and to shorten the converting cycle, most industrial processes, as well as emerging ones, are aiming at production of high matte grade. However, the increase in oxygen potential required by these processes results in highly oxidised slags with significant copper contents, which require their treatment for copper recovery. Despite the fact that long established slag cleaning processes perform reasonaby well for slags in the range 1.5% - 2.5% in copper, i.e. coexisting matte in the order 60% in copper content, they must be reconsidered when applying to slags equilibrating with high matte grades and/or white metal. The present study concentrates on the mechanism of copper losses into slags, its association to sulfur and oxygen, mainly, and methods for its recovery. Based on these considerations, high temperature liquid-liquid phase separation, i.e. Teniente type reactor, slag flotation and slag leaching methods technologies are discussed as specially applied in Chilean smelters. Also, a new approach based on material characteristics of both matte and slag, i.e. magnetic separation, is presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 475-479)

Pages:

2745-2752

Citation:

Online since:

January 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. C. Yannopoulus: Can. Met. Quart- 10, 1971, 291 - 306.

Google Scholar

[2] J. B. W. Bailey and F. A. Garner: Min. Science Eng. Vol. 6 (2), April 1974, 106 - 117.

Google Scholar

[3] L. N. Akella, K. I. Vasu and P. M. Prasad: Jr. Elect. Society, India 27 (1), 1978, 1 -9.

Google Scholar

[4] J. M. Floyd and P. C. Mackey: Proc. Int. Symp. Extractive Metallurgy, IMM London 1982, 345 - 371.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Jalkanen: Scan. Jr. Metallurgy Vol. 10, 1981, 177 - 184.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Takeda: 4th Int. Conf. Molten Slags and Fluxes, Sendai ISIJ, 1992, 584 - 595.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Akagi, Y. Suzuki and M. Higashi: Met. Rev. MMIJ Vol 10 (2) 1993, 42 - 57.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Poggi, R. Minto and W. G. Davenport: Jr. Metals, November 1969, 40 - 45.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Sridhar, J. M. Toguri and S, Simeonov: Met. and Materials Trans. B, Vol. 28, April 1997, 191 - 200.

Google Scholar

[10] I&IT Fundicion Caletones Codelco Chile: Informe I - 2253, Julio (1998).

Google Scholar

[11] G. Acurra and P. Echeverría: Proc. Int. Conference Copper 99, Vol VI: Smelting, Technology, Development Process, Modeling and Fundaments. Ed. C. Diaz, C. Landolt and T. Utigard, 1999, 137 - 152.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Mori and T. Kimura: Net. Rev. MMIJ Vol. 3 (3), 1986, 141 - 154.

Google Scholar

[13] K. Itagaki, M. Hino, A. Zakeri and D. G. Mendoza: Proc. Int. Conference Copper 2003: The Hermann Scharze Symposium on Copper Pyrometallurgy, Vol. IV / Book 2. Ed. C. Diaz, C. Landolt and T. Utigard, 2003, 427 - 436.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Yazawa, M. Hino and D. R. Swinbourne: Minprex 2000, Melbourne September 2000, 419 - 424.

Google Scholar

[15] CIMM, Centro de Investigacion Minera Metalurgica: Informe Final Proyecto A4 - 13024, Marzo 1995. Slag type % Cu % Cu rec. % Cu % Cu rec. % Cu % Cu rec. % Cu % Cu rec. % Cu % Cu rec. % Cu % Cu rec. Teniente slags Granulated 8. 52 44. 93 10. 02 25. 54 38. 6 3. 54 73. 71 1. 51 19. 71 2. 34 6. 32 0. 66 0. 26 26. 29 Ambient cooled 86. 74 41. 86 13. 0 27. 7 38. 5 3. 09 72. 65 1. 87 20. 94 3. 48 6. 1 0. 8 0. 29 27. 33 Flash slags Granulated 81. 64 48. 57 6. 27 21. 68 38. 7 4. 6 74. 85 0. 92 17. 14 1. 6 7. 0 0. 53 0. 21 24. 35 Ambient cooled 84. 4 50. 68 3. 36 18. 81 38. 8 6. 84 76. 22 0. 56 15. 87 1. 04 7. 47 0. 42 0. 18 23. 52 Nonmagnetics fraction, copper species Copper+Matte, % Copper in fayalite, % Copper plates, % Total rec. % Magnetite, % Fayalite, % Silica, % Magnetics fraction, iron species Total rec.

DOI: 10.1201/9781420027228-61

Google Scholar

[16] L. M. Irwin , R. E. Lubker and R. A. Marsyla: US. Bureau of Mines, R. I. 5955, (1962).

Google Scholar

[17] K. N. Subramanian and N. T. Themelis: Jr. Metals, Vol. 24 N° 4, 1972, 33 - 38.

Google Scholar

[18] C. M. Acuna: Fondecyt Report N° 89-866, May (1990).

Google Scholar

[19] S. Demetrio, M. A. Duran, U. Rojas, P. Reyes, J. Ahumada, E. Mast, J. Sanhueza and E. Morales: Jr. Metals Vol 25 (2002), 21- 42.

Google Scholar

[20] C. M. Acuna: Met. and Found. Engineering Vol. 26 (1), 1999, 9 - 19.

Google Scholar

[21] Novatec S. A: Internal Report Division Chuquicamata, Smelter R&D Superintendency, March (1998).

Google Scholar

[22] CB Mineria y Metalurgia: classified information, Internal Report Division Chuquicamata, Smelter R&D Superintendency, December (1999).

Google Scholar

[23] CB Mineria y Metalurgia: classified information, Internal Report Division Chuquicamata, Smelter R&D Superintendency, August (2001).

Google Scholar