Paper Titles
Inter and Intra Granular Strain Analysis by Microdiffraction Kossel
p.159
Residual Stress Mapping in Railway Rails
p.165
Residual Stress Error Introduced by Truncated Patterns: Prediction and Correction
p.171
A New Type of Instrument with Its Special Excited Input-Signal in Inspecting Residual Stress
p.177
Effects of Temperature Fluctuations on X-Ray Stress Determination
p.183
Ultrasonic Evaluation of Compressive Residual Stress of Surface Treated Metals
p.184
Determination of Volume Fraction of Constituents in Deformed Stainless Steel by Means of Image Plate
p.190
Residual Stresses Measurement Using an Indentation Made by an Impact Load
p.196
Measurement on X-Ray Stress Constant of Beryllium
p.202

Effects of Temperature Fluctuations on X-Ray Stress Determination

Article Preview

Abstract:

The results presented in this paper are part of a process to analyse systematically the sources of uncertainty in X-ray stress determination. They concern one part of the effects of temperature variations which could intervene either as random fluctuations or as a monotonic drift during the acquisition. The proposed formulation is in agreement with the recommendations of the ISO guide on the expression of uncertainty (GUM). It was found that the effect is usually negligible for laboratory experiments which are often temperature controlled and for most materials. However the uncertainty can reach 20 MPa for austenitic steels and a temperature drift of 2 K.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Residual Stresses VII, ICRS7 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 490-491)

Pages:

183-183

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.490-491.183

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2005

Authors:

Manuel François, C. Ferreira, Ronald Guillén

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] Kanagaraj S., Pattanayak S., Measurement of the thermal expansion of metal and FRPs, Cryogenics 43 (2003) 399-424.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-2275(03)00096-1

Google Scholar

[2] François M., Ferreira C., Guillén R., Approximate analytical formulae to evaluate the uncertainty in X-ray stress analysis, Proc. of ICRS7, Xi'An, People's Republic of China, June 14- 17, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] ISO, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 1993, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation.

Google Scholar

[4] Lira I.H., Wöger W., Evaluation of the uncertainty associated with a measurement result not corrected for systematic effects, Meas. Sci. Technol. 9 (1998) 1010-1011.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/9/6/019

Google Scholar

[5] Kirkup L., A guide to GUM, Eur. J. Phys. 23 (2002) 483-487.

Google Scholar

[6] Lira I.: Evaluating the measurement uncertainty : fundamentals and practical guidance (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2002).

Google Scholar

[7] Gloaguen D., François M., Guillén R., Royer J., Evolution of internal stresses in rolled Zr702, Acta Mater 50 (4) 2002, 871-880.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00380-9

Google Scholar

[8] Gloaguen D., François M., Guillén R., Royer J., Interpretation of X-Ray Stress Measurement and Evaluation of Internal Residual Stresses in Rolled a-Ti40 Using Self-Consistent Models, phys. stat. sol. (a) 193, No. 1, 2002, 12-25.

DOI: 10.1002/1521-396x(200209)193:1<12::aid-pssa12>3.0.co;2-j

Google Scholar