Temperature Dependence of Internal Stress and Crystal Growth of Dilute Cu Alloy Films

Article Preview

Abstract:

Annealing behavior of dilute Cu-X alloys (adding element X = transition metal and rare-earth metal with less than 3 at %) was investigated in terms of resistivity, internal stress, grain growth and hillock formation. The resistivity increases with addition of impurities regardless of kinds of adding elements. Generally, resistivity starts to decrease on annealing above 200 °C. Among present Cu dilute alloys, Sn addition shows the lowest resistivity 2.5 μΩcm on annealing at 400 °C. However, compared with a pure Cu film, salient grain growth of present dilute alloys does not takes place even at temperatures above 300 °C , where the grain size is nearly the same as that of as-deposited films. In-situ surface observation using an atomic force microscope (AFM ) revealed that hillocks did not grow on cooling stage (under tension), but started to form on heating stage (under compression). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation of hillocks thus formed in present dilute alloy films shows that the external appearance of these defects was quite different from those observed in Al and Al alloy films. They most likely grow with a preferential crystal plane, not irregular growth like Al and Al alloy films. The internal stresses in most of the present as-deposited dilute Cu alloy films were nearly zero or compression of –25 to –100MPa, and upon annealing, they started to increase in tensile manner due to thermal stresses induced by the mismatch of the thermal expansion between substrates and deposited films. A large stress relaxation started to occur above 250°C, associating with a large number of hillock formation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 127)

Pages:

147-152

Citation:

Online since:

September 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Cabral, Jr., J. M. E. Harper, K. Holloway, D. A. Smith, and R. G. Schad, J. Va. Sci. Technol. A 10(4), 1709 (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Barmak, G. A. Lucadamo, C. Cabral, Jr., C. Lavoie, and J. M. E. Harper, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 564, 341 (1999).

Google Scholar

[3] K. Barmak, A. Gungor, C. Cabral, Jr, and J. M. E. Harper, J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 94, 1605 (2003)

Google Scholar

[4] S. Takayama and N. Tsutsui, Extended abstracts of the 1995 International conf. On solid state devices and materials, Osaka, Japan, 1995, pp.318-320.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Takayama and N. Tsutsui, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 403, 645 (1996). compression tension 0 Elastic +Plastic Plastic(creep) Plastic(creep) Elastic Elastic Stress.σ Plastic(creep) 1002004 00 300 Annealing Tem perature (℃) A B C compression tension compression tension 0 Elastic +Plastic Plastic(creep) Plastic(creep) Elastic Elastic Stress.σ Plastic(creep) 1002004 00 300 Annealing Tem perature (℃) A B C Fig. 9. Schematic illustration of a thermal cycle of the internal stress induced in the film during annealing.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1707682

Google Scholar