Papers by Author: R. Sonnemans

Abstract: The removal of ion implanted photoresist (II-PR) after implantation of ultra shallow extension and halo regions is considered as one of the most challenging front-end-of-line (FEOL) processing steps for 32nm and beyond CMOS technology nodes. Commonly used resist strip processes such as fluorine-based dry plasma ash and hot sulfuric/peroxide mixtures induce unacceptable levels of oxidation and material loss [1-.

Abstract: The most advanced technology nodes require ultra shallow extension implants (low energy) which are very vulnerable to ash related substrate oxidation, silicon and dopant loss, which can result in a dramatic increase of the source/drain resistance and shifted transistor threshold voltages. A robust post extension ion implant ash process is required in order to meet cleanliness, near zero Si loss and dopant loss specifications. This paper discusses a performance comparison between fluorine-free, reducing and oxidizing, ash chemistries and “as implanted – no strip” process conditions, for both state-of-the-art nMOS and pMOS implanted fin resistors. Fluorine-free processes were chosen since earlier experiments with fluorine containing plasma strips exhibited almost a 10x increase in sheet resistance in the worse case.