Papers by Author: Taro Takemura

Abstract: The adsorption of multiple proteins derived from fetal bovine serum (FBS) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and alpha minimum essential (aMEM) was in situ analyzed with a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation technique on gold, titanium and HAp sensors. The adsorption behaviors of FBS proteins were varied depending on the sensors. The DD/Df value of the HAp sensor were clearly different in PBS and aMEM, and others were not changed. The viscoelastic properties of the protein films adsorbed on the HAp sensor in PBS were flexible in comparison with those on the gold and titanium sensors. The D-f plots incidated that the proteins adsorbed on HAp in PBS would lead to competitive adsorption and conformational change and those in aMEM could form a monolayer. The adsorption behavior on the HAp in carbonate buffer saline was found to be similar to that in aMEM. These differential adsorption behaviors on the HAp surface were attributed to the pre-adsorptive ion, such PO43- or CO32- in the solvent.

Abstract: Surfaces of sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) were treated with four kinds of acids, hydrochloric acid (HCl), nitric acid (HNO3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). On these acid-treated HAp surfaces, osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured for 20 days. The matrix mineralization was observed in HCl-treated HAp and HNO3-treated HAp, but not in non-treated HAp, H2SO4-treated HAp and H2O2-treated HAp. Gene expressions of Bglap2 encoding osteocalcin and Akp2 encoding alkaline phosphatase were higher in HCl-treated HAp and HNO3-treated HAp than those in the others. These results indicate that not only hydrochloric acid but also nitric acid improves performance of HAp to mature osteoblast.

Abstract: Gene expression profile of osteoblast-like cells cultured on dense disk materials and porous materials of calcium phosphate ceramics was constructed from DNA microarray analyses. The profile revealed that gene expression patterns of porous materials were significantly different from those of dense disk materials. The porous materials had a capacity to induce expressions of genes involved in osteoblast differentiation, while dense disk materials regulated gene expressions related to osteoclastogenesis.