Papers by Keyword: Phase Mapping

Abstract: EBSD is a well known technique that allows orientation and phase mapping using an SEM. Although the technique is very powerful, has serious limitations related with a) special resolution limited to 50 nm (SEM-FEG) and b) specimen preparation issues as is not possible to obtain EBSD signal from rough surfaces or strained materials , nanoparticles etc.. To address those difficulties , a novel technique has been developed recently (EBSD-TEM like) allowing automatic orientation and phase mapping using template matching analysis of acquired diffraction patterns in TEM. Electron beam is scanned through the sample area of interest ; the acquired electron diffraction patterns from several sample locations are compared via cross-correlation matching techniques with pre-calculted simulated templates to reveal local crystal orientation and phases. The dedicated device (ASTAR) allows orientation and phase identification of crystallographic orientation in a region of interest up to 10µm2, with a step size ranging from 1nm to 20nm depending on the transmission electron microscope setting (FEG or LaB6).

Abstract: Precession electron diffraction (PED) is a new promising technique for electron diffraction pattern collection under quasi-kinematical conditions (as in X-ray Diffraction), which enables “ab-initio” solving of crystalline structures of nanocrystals. The PED technique may be used in TEM instruments of voltages 100 to 400 kV and is an effective upgrade of the TEM instrument to a true electron diffractometer. The PED technique, when combined with fast electron diffraction acquisition and pattern matching software techniques, may also be used for the high magnification ultra-fast mapping of variable crystal orientations and phases, similarly to what is achieved with the Electron Backscattered Diffraction (EBSD) technique in Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM) at lower magnifications and longer acquisition times.

Abstract: Fatigue initiation behaviour in three multi-component Al-Si casting alloys with varying Si content is compared using a range of microscopy and analytical techniques. A higher proportion of stiffer secondary phases leads to load transfer effects reducing particle cracking and particle/matrix debonding. Si appears stronger than the Al9FeNi phase, which cracks and debonds to form initiation sites preferentially over Si. Reducing Si content results in clusters of intermetallics forming, and increased porosity. The effect of porosity, combined with mesoscopic load transfer effects to the high volume fraction intermetallic regions make these potent crack initiation sites in low silicon alloys.