Evolution of Nanoindentation Hardness of Fe/Cu Nanometer-Scale Multilayers by Magnetron Sputtering

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fe/Cu nanometer-scale multilayers with nominal modulation wavelengths ranging from 5 to 40 nm are deposited by direct current magnetron sputtering on Si (100) substrates. Modulation structures of the multilayers are examined by small angle / wide angle x-ray diffraction (SA/WAXRD) and cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM). Hardness of the multilayers is measured by using nanoindentation. All the multilayers have Fe (110) and Cu (111) textures. Interface coherency is observed in the multilayers with designed modulation wavelengths of 5 and 10 nm. The hardness increases firstly and then deceases with increasing the modulation wavelength, and reaches peak value of 7.29±0.29 GPa in the multilayers with nominal modulation wavelength of 10 nm. The evolution of the hardness of the mulitlayers is explained by interface width and modulus difference between sublayers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 373-374)

Pages:

104-107

Citation:

Online since:

March 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.M. Clemens, H. Kung and S.A. Barnett: MRS Bull. Vol. 24 (1999), p.20.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Misra, H. Kung: Adv. Eng. Mater. Vol. 3 (2001), p.217.

Google Scholar

[3] X. Zhang, A. Misra, H. Wang, T.D. Shen, M. Nastasi, T.E. Mitchell, J.P. Hirth, R.G. Hoagland and J.D. Embury: Acta Mater. Vol. 52 (2004), p.995.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.033

Google Scholar

[4] N.J. Petch: J. Iron Steel Inst. London Vol. 173 (1953), p.25.

Google Scholar

[5] J.D. Embury and J.P. Hirth: Acta Met. Vol. 42 (1994), p. (2051).

Google Scholar

[6] W.D. Nix: Mat. Sci. Eng. Vol. A234-236 (1997), p.37.

Google Scholar

[7] J.S. Koehler: Phys. Rev. B Vol. 2 (1978), p.547.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Shinn, L. Hultman and S.A. Barnett: J. Mater. Res. Vol. 7 (1992), p.901.

Google Scholar

[9] S.L. Lehoczky: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 49 (1978), p.5479.

Google Scholar

[10] W.M.C. Yang, T. Tsakalakos and J.E. Hilliard: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 48 (1977), p.876.

Google Scholar

[11] N.R. Shamsutdinov, A.J. Böttger and F.D. Tichelaar: Scr. Mater. Vol. 54 (2006), p.1727.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Kozono, M. Komuro, S. Narishige, M. Hanazono and Y. Sugita: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 61 (1987), p.4311.

Google Scholar

[13] D.W. Lee, D.H. Ryan, Z. Altounian and A. Kuprin: Phys. Rev. B Vol. 59 (1999), p.7001.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Arita, A. Kuwahara, Y. Yamada, M. Doi and M. Matsui: Thin Solid Films Vol. 318 (1998), p.180.

DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(97)01161-9

Google Scholar

[15] M.K. Lei, Z.L. Wu, T. Chen and B.S. Cao: Thin Solid Films Vol. 500 (2006), p.174.

Google Scholar

[16] E. Fullerton, I.K. Schuller, H. Vanderstraeten and Y. Bruynseraede: Phys. Rev. B Vol. 91 (2002), p.9292.

Google Scholar

[17] X. Chu and S.A. Barnett: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 77 (1995), p.4403.

Google Scholar