Comparative Analysis of λ≈9µm GaAs/AlGaAs Quantum Cascade Lasers with Different Injector Doping

Article Preview

Abstract:

An experimental and theoretical comparative analysis of the output characteristics of λ ≈ 9m GaAs/Al0.45Ga0.55As quantum cascade lasers based on single and double phonon resonance depopulation mechanisms were presented. The layer structures were grown with solid source molecular beam epitaxy and consist of 48 or 36 active stages embedded in a symmetrical plasmon enhanced waveguide. From the wafers, ridge waveguide lasers were fabricated by optical lithography and dry etching. The theoretical model is based on a fully non-equilibrium Schrödinger- Poisson self-consistent analysis of the coupled scattering rate and single-temperature energy balance equations, taking all relevant electron-LO phonon, electron-electron and electron-ionised impurity scattering processes into account. Single phonon resonance devices exhibit clear current saturation, simultaneously with a decrease of the optical power. In the moderate doping regime, a quasi-linear dependence of both the threshold and saturation current densities on injector doping, were measured, in a very good agreement with theoretical predictions. Double phonon resonance lasers exhibit ‘saturation’ mechanism evident from their decrease in optical power, but without pronounced current saturation. Previously reported saturation of the ‘maximal’ current under higher injector doping in single phonon resonance lasers, is also observed in the double phonon resonance structure for injector sheet doping above 8x1011cm-2.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

29-34

Citation:

Online since:

July 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Faist, F. Capasso, D.L. Sivco, C. Sirtori, A.L. Hutchinson and A.Y. Cho: Science Vol. 264 (1994), p.553.

DOI: 10.1126/science.264.5158.553

Google Scholar

[2] C. Sirtori, P. Kruck, S. Barbieri, P. Collot, J. Nagle, M. Beck, J. Faist and U. Oesterle: Appl. Phys. Lett Vol. 73 (1998), p.3486.

DOI: 10.1063/1.122812

Google Scholar

[3] L.R. Wilson, D.A. Carder, J.W. Cockburn, R.P. Green, D.G. Revin, M.J. Steer, M. Hopkinson, G. Hill and R. Airey: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 81 (2002), p.1378.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1500775

Google Scholar

[4] G. Scalari, S. Blaser, J. Faist, H. Beere, E. Linfield and D. Ritchie: Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 93 (2004), p.237403.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Page, C. Becker, A. Robertson, G. Glastre, V. Ortiz and C. Sirtori: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 78 (2001), p.3529.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Anders, W. Schrenk, E. Gornik and G. Strasser: Appl. Phys. Lett Vol. 80 (2002), p.1864.

Google Scholar

[7] D.A. Carder, L.R. Wilson, R.P. Green, J.W. Cockburn, M. Hopkinson, M.J. Steer, R. Airey and G. Hill: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 82 (2003), p.3409.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1576908

Google Scholar

[8] C. Pflügl, W. Schrenk, S. Anders, G. Strasser, C. Becker, C. Sirtori, Y. Bonetti and A. Muller: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 83 (2003), p.4698.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1633021

Google Scholar

[9] R. Köhler, A. Tredicucci, F. Beltram, H.E. Beere, E.H. Linfield, A.G. Davies, D.A. Ritchie and F. Rossi: Nature Vol. 417 (2002), p.156.

DOI: 10.1038/417156a

Google Scholar

[10] H.E. Beere, J.C. Fowler, J. Alton, E.H. Linfield, D.A. Ritchie, R. Köhler, A. Tredicucci, G. Scalari, L. Ajili, J. Faist and S. Barbieri: J. Cryst. Growth Vol. 278 (2005), p.756.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.172

Google Scholar

[11] G. Scalari, N. Hoyler, M. Giovannini and J. Faist: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 86 (2005), p.181101.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1920407

Google Scholar

[12] B.S. Williams, S. Kumar, Q. Hu and J.L. Reno: Optics Express Vol. 13 (2005), p.3331.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Barbieri, C. Sirtori, H. Page, M. Stellmacher and J. Nagle: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 78 (2001), p.282.

Google Scholar

[14] V. Ortiz, C. Becker, H. Page and C. Sirtori: J. Cryst. Growth Vol. 251 (2003), p.701.

Google Scholar

[15] C. Sirtori, H. Page, C. Becker and V. Ortiz: IEEE J. of Quantum Electron. Vol. 38 (2002), p.547.

Google Scholar

[16] M. Giehler, R. Hey, H. Kostial, S. Cronenberg, T. Ohtsuka, L. Schrottke and H.T. Grahn: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 82 (2003), p.671.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1541099

Google Scholar

[17] S. -C. Lee, M. Giehler, R. Hey, T. Ohtsuka, A. Wacker and H.T. Grahn: Semicond. Sci. Technol. Vol. 19 (2004), p. S45.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Höfling, R. Kallweit, J. Seufert, J. Koeth, J.P. Reithmaier and A. Forchel: J. Cryst. Growth Vol. 278 (2005), p.775.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.096

Google Scholar

[19] V.D. Jovanović, D. Indjin, N. Vukmirović, Z. Ikonić, P. Harrison, E.H. Linfield, H. Page, X. Marcadet, C. Sirtori, C. Worrall, H.E. Beere and D.A. Ritchie: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 81 (2005), p.211117.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1937993

Google Scholar

[20] A. Mirčetić, D. Indjin, Z. Ikonić, P. Harrison, V. Milanović and R.W. Kelsall: J. Appl. Phys Vol. 97 (2005), p.084506.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1882768

Google Scholar

[21] D. Indjin, A. Mirčetić, P. Harrison, R.W. Kelsall, Z. Ikonić, V.D. Jovanović, V. Milanović, M. Giehler, R. Hey and H.T. Grahn: AIP, Conf. Proc. Vol. 772 (2005), p.1565.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.494.25

Google Scholar

[22] M. Beck, D. Hofstetter, T. Aellen, J. Faist, U. Oesterle, M. Ilegems, E. Gini and H. Melchior: Science Vol. 301 (2002), p.295.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1066408

Google Scholar

[23] A. Straub, T.S. Mosely, C. Gmachl, R. Colombelli, M. Troccoli, F. Capasso, D.L. Sivco and A.Y. Cho: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 80 (2002), p.2845.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1472473

Google Scholar

[24] J.S. Yu, S. Slivken, A. Evans, J. David and M. Razeghi: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 82 (2003), p.3397.

Google Scholar

[25] D. Indjin, Z. Ikonić, V.D. Jovanović, N. Vukmirović, P. Harrison, and R.W. Kelsall, Semicond. Science. Technol. Vol. 20 (2005), p. S237.

DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/20/7/014

Google Scholar

[26] D. Indjin, P. Harrison, R.W. Kelsall and Z. Ikonić: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 81 (2002), p.400.

Google Scholar