Overview of Forming and Formability Issues for High Volume Aluminium Car Body Panels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cost-efficient designs of aluminum autobody structures consist mainly of stampings using conventional technology. Progress in metallurgy and forming processes has enabled aluminum body panels to achieve significant market share, particularly for hoods. Fast bake hardening alloys with better hemming performance were developed for improved outer panel sheet products. Specific guidelines for handling and press working were established to form aluminum panels using similar schedules and production lines as steel parts. Stamping productivity was improved by optimization of the trimming process to reduce sliver/particle generation and resulting end-of-line manual rework. Both hemming formability and trimming quality not only depend on tooling setup but also on microstructural features, which govern intrinsic alloy ductility. Targets for the next high volume aluminum car body applications, such as roof panels and doors, require higher strength and/or better formability. The challenges of complex stampings can be met with optimized alloys and lubricants, with improved numerical simulation to fine-tune stamping process parameters, and with the introduction of new technologies. Warm forming was examined as a potential breakthrough technology for high volume stamping of complex geometries.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 519-521)

Pages:

795-802

Citation:

Online since:

July 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G.M. Raynaud and M. Henne, 2nd Int Light Metals Technology Conference, Vienna (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] L. Chappuis, AluForm Congress, Paris (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] J. M. Story, G. W. Jarvis, H. R. Zonker and S. J. Murtha, SAE paper 930277 (1993).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Li and G. Fata, SAE Paper 1999-01-0661 (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Bacha, H. Klocker, D. Daniel, IDDRG congress, Besançon (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] D. Daniel, R. Shahani, R. Baldo, J.L. Hoffmann, Int. Body Eng. Conference, Detroit (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Shahani, 7th European Automotive Lightweight Conference, Bad Nauheim, (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] European Aluminium Association, Automotive Manual, http: /www. eaa. net/aam.

Google Scholar

[9] A. K. Sachdev, Metall. Trans. A, vol. 21A (1990), p.165.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Sacerdotti et al., Meas. Sci. and Techno., vol. 13 (2002), p.21.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Meiler, M. Pfestorf, M. Geiger and M. Merklein, Wear, Vol. 255 (2003), p.1455.

Google Scholar

[12] S. F. Golovashchenko, J. Mat. Eng. and Performance, vol. 14(4) (2005), p.508.

Google Scholar

[13] K. Siegert, Sheet Metal forming technology symposium, San Diego (1999).

Google Scholar

[14] P. A. Tebbe, G. T. Kridli, Int. J. of Mat. and Product Techno., vol. 21 (2004), p.24.

Google Scholar

[15] P. A. Friedman and S. G. Luckey, 8th Int. Conf. Superplasticity in Adv. Mat., Oxford (2003).

Google Scholar

[16] P. Litalien, A. Legendre, D. Daniel and G.M. Raynaud, patent n° EP1601478 (2005) Failure a) b).

Google Scholar