Paper Titles
Scratch Test of TiCN Thin Films with Different Preferred Orientation
p.729
Strains, Stresses and Elastic Properties in Polycrystalline Metallic Thin Films: In Situ Deformation Combined with X-Ray Diffraction and Simulation Experiments
p.735
Oxford HEXameter: Laboratory High Energy X-Ray Diffractometer for Bulk Residual Stress Analysis
p.743
A New Type of X-Ray Diffractometer with Cooperating Robots for Residual Stress Analysis on Large Components
p.749
Effect of Detector Width and Peak Location Technique on Residual Stress Determination in Case of Work-Hardened Materials
p.755
Specific Corrections Associated to Linear CCD Detectors Used in X-Ray Diffraction
p.761
Internal Stress Development during Fatigue Cycling of High-Strength Al/SiC Metal Matrix Composites
p.769
Effective Stresses and Plastic Strain Rates in a Superalloy: a High Temperature In Situ Study by Synchrotron X-Ray TCD
p.775
Varistor Ceramic: Residual Strain and Texture Analysis by Neutron Time-of-Flight Diffraction
p.781

Effect of Detector Width and Peak Location Technique on Residual Stress Determination in Case of Work-Hardened Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

To enhance the fatigue resistance of mechanical components, different surface treatment processes are often applied to put the near surface layer into compression. Surface treatment processes are typically associated with deformation and work-hardening of the material. When applying x-ray diffraction techniques to the characterization of such surfaces, the work-hardening will cause the x-ray diffraction peak width to increase. When peak widths reach high values, the peak tail may extend beyond the active area or window of the multichannel x-ray detector, in which case the peak is truncated. Subsequent analytical treatment of broad diffraction peaks is troublesome and advanced numerical methods are required to accurately determine the peak position. The following work indicates that when a wider detector is used it is possible to collect the full, non-truncated peak, determine the peak position with a high level of confidence and subsequently, to calculate the residual stress with much improved repeatability and reproducibility.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Residual Stresses VII, ECRS7 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 524-525)

Pages:

755-760

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.524-525.755

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2006

Authors:

M. Belassel, Eliane Bocher, J. Pineault

Keywords:

Hardened Material, Residual Stress Simulation, Wide Detector, Wide Peaks, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] I. C. Noyan and J. B. Cohen, Residual Stress - Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer-Verlag, New York, (1987).

Google Scholar

[2] F. Convert, Mesure des Déplacements des Pics de Diffraction Très larges Dans L'Analyse des Contraintes Par Diffractométrie X, Revue Française de Mécanique, 1993, pp.81-92.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Guarc, "PFE LM3 ENSAM Paris, (1995).

Google Scholar

[4] V. Hauk, Structural and Residual Stress Analysis by Nondestructive Methods, Ed. Elsevier, (1997).

Google Scholar

[5] AFNOR XP A 09-285, Méthodes D'essais Pour L'analyse Des Contraintes Résiduelles Par Diffraction des Rayons X, Mai (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] G. Lespinasse et al., Optimization of Residual Stress Analysis of Gears by X-Ray Diffraction, Proceedings of ECRS5, Vol. 1, 1996, pp.317-326.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Lu et al. Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, Published by the Fairmont Press, Inc., (1996).

Google Scholar