Atomic Force and Confocal Microscopic Studies of Collagen-Cell-Based Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering

Article Preview

Abstract:

Collagen is the most used naturally occurring scaffold material. It’s a structural protein ubiquitous among mammalian. The ability of collagen type I to host different cell phenotype in vitro and its low antigenecity in vivo are well known. However, the principal drawback of collagenbased materials consists in their low mechanical properties. For vascular tissue engineering this represents a major limit, as the aim is to mimic the structure of a native vessel, which is known to be resistant and viscoelastic. Moreover, vascular cells are known to be susceptible in vivo to reorganize the matrix in which they proliferate. Therefore, the aim of this project is to study the micro structural organization of collagen-based scaffolds, and to assess the interactions between collagen and smooth muscle cells during regeneration. This knowledge will then allow the development of appropriate strategies to tailor the microstructure of the scaffold and its properties. Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were selected to study the interactions between cells and matrix during the proliferation. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) in dry state in tapping mode and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) in reflection mode were used to investigate the microstructure of the scaffold. For the former technique cells were seeded on top of the collagen gel after jellification, while for the latter, cells were embedded into the collagen gel and stained with Rhodamine. The contact points between matrix and cells were investigated, as well as the capacity of vascular cells to induce a structural reorganization of collagen fibrils in the scaffold.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 15-17)

Pages:

83-88

Citation:

Online since:

February 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Ross, Nature, Vol. 362 (1993), p.801.

Google Scholar

[2] M. J. Plank, D. J. Wall and T. David, Prog Biophys Mol Biol, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] G. C. Lantz, S. F. Badylak, M. C. Hiles, A. C. Coffey, L. A. Geddes, K. Kokini, G. E. Sandusky and R. J. Morff, J Invest Surg, Vol. 6 (1993), p.297.

DOI: 10.3109/08941939309141619

Google Scholar

[4] Y. G. Wilson, M. G. Wyatt, I. C. Currie, R. N. Baird and P. M. Lamont, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, Vol. 10 (1995), p.220.

Google Scholar

[5] C. H. Lee, A. Singla and Y. Lee, Int J Pharm, Vol. 221 (2001), p.1.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Hayashi and K. Mizuno, Creighton TE (ed) Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] T. J. Wess, Adv Protein Chem, Vol. 70 (2005), p.341.

Google Scholar

[8] P. L. Jones, F. S. Jones, B. Zhou and M. Rabinovitch, J Cell Sci, Vol. 112 ( Pt 4) (1999), p.435.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Raspanti, T. Congiu and S. Guizzardi, Matrix Biol, Vol. 20 (2001), p.601.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Venturoni, T. Gutsmann, G. E. Fantner, J. H. Kindt and P. K. Hansma, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, Vol. 303 (2003), p.508.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Jastrzebska, B. Barwinski, I. Mroz, A. Turek, J. Zalewska-Rejdak and B. Cwalina, Eur Phys J E Soft Matter, (2005).

DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2004-10093-1

Google Scholar

[12] F. Boccafoschi, J. Habermehl, N. Rajan, M. Cannas and D. Mantovani, Submitted to Biomaterials, (2006).

Google Scholar

[13] F. Boccafoschi, J. Habermehl, S. Vesentini and D. Mantovani, Biomaterials, Vol. 26 (2005), p.7410.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.052

Google Scholar

[14] J. Habermehl, J. Skopinska, F. Boccafoschi, A. Sionkowska, H. Kaczmarek, G. Laroche and D. Mantovani, Macromol Bioscience, Vol. 5 (2005), p.821.

DOI: 10.1002/mabi.200500102

Google Scholar

[15] J. A. Petruska and A. J. Hodge, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 51 (1964), p.871.

Google Scholar

[16] T. J. Wess, A. P. Hammersley, L. Wess and A. Miller, J Struct Biol, Vol. 122 (1998), p.92.

Google Scholar

[17] V. Ottani, M. Raspanti and A. Ruggeri, Micron, Vol. 32 (2001), p.251.

Google Scholar

[18] K. E. Kadler, D. F. Holmes, J. A. Trotter and J. A. Chapman, Biochem J, Vol. 316 ( Pt 1) (1996), p.1.

Google Scholar

[19] D. E. Birk and R. L. Trelstad, J Cell Biol, Vol. 103 (1986), p.231.

Google Scholar

[20] T. Gutsmann, G. E. Fantner, M. Venturoni, A. Ekani-Nkodo, J. B. Thompson, J. H. Kindt, D. E. Morse, D. K. Fygenson and P. K. Hansma, Biophys J, Vol. 84 (2003), p.2593.

DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)75064-4

Google Scholar

[21] J. P. Stegemann, H. Hong and R. M. Nerem, J Appl Physiol, Vol. 98 (2005), p.2321.

Google Scholar

[22] C. M. Shanahan and P. L. Weissberg, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, Vol. 18 (1998), p.333.

Google Scholar

[23] K. Bilodeau, F. Couet, F. Boccafoschi and D. Mantovani, Artif Organs, Vol. 29 (2005), p.906.

Google Scholar