Insights into the Metabolism and Ecophysiology of Three Acidithiobacilli by Comparative Genome Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Draft genome sequences of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans ATCC 19377 and A. caldus ATCC 51756 have been annotated. Bioinformatic analysis of these two new genomes, together with that of A. ferrooxidans ATCC 23270, allows the prediction of metabolic and regulatory models for each species and has provided a unique opportunity to undertake comparative genomic studies of this group of bioleaching bacteria. In this paper, we report preliminary information on metabolic and electron transfer pathways for ten characteristics of the three acidithiobacilli: CO2 fixation, the TCA cycle, sulfur oxidation, sulfur reduction, iron oxidation, iron assimilation, hydrogen oxidation, flagella formation, Che signaling (chemotaxis) and nitrogen fixation. Predicted transcriptional and metabolic interplay between pathways pinpoints potential coordinated responses to environmental signals such as energy source, oxygen and nutrient limitations. The predicted pathway for nitrogen fixation in A. ferrooxidans will be described as an example of such an integrated response. Several responses appear to be especially characteristic of autotrophic microorganisms and may have direct implications for metabolic processes of critical relevance to the understanding of how these microorganisms survive and proliferate in extreme environments, including industrial bioleaching operations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 20-21)

Pages:

439-442

Citation:

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Quatrini, C. Lefimil, F. A. Veloso, I. Pedroso, D. S. Holmes and E. Jedlicki: Nucl. Acids Res. Vol. 37 (2007), p.2153.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Rivas, M. Seeger, E. Jedlicki and D. S. Holmes: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Barreto, E. Jedlicki and D. S. Holmes: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 71 (2005), p.2902.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Rivas, M. Seeger, D. S. Holmes and E. Jedlicki: Biological Res. Vol. 38 (2005), p.283.

Google Scholar

[5] D. S. Holmes, M. Barreto, J. Valdes, C. Dominguez, C. Arriagada, S. Silver, S. Bueno and E. Jedlicki: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 71 (2003), p.97.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-386x(03)00145-2

Google Scholar

[6] C. Farah, M. Vera, D. Morin, D. Haras, C. A. Jerez and N. Guiliani: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 71 (2005), p.7033.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.71.11.7033-7040.2005

Google Scholar

[7] K.Y. Ng, R. Sawada, S. Inoue, K. Kamimura and T. Sugio: J. Biosci. Bioeng. Vol. 90 (2000), p.199.

Google Scholar

[9] C.A. Kilkenny, D.K. Berger and D.E. Rawlings: Microbiology Vol. 140 (1994), p.2543.

Google Scholar

[8] M.E.J. Mackintosh: Gen. Microbiol. Vol. 105 (1978), p.215.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Dixon and D. Kahn: Nat. Rev. Microbiol. Vol. 2 (2004), p.621.

Google Scholar

[11] A. J. Ninfa and P. Jiang: Curr. Opin. Microbiol. Vol. 8 (2005), p.168.

Google Scholar