Paper Titles
Research on Material Removal Algorithm Model in Virtual Milling Process Based on Adaptive Dynamic Quadtrees Algorithm
p.822
Development of Surface Image Scanning Device Measurement Head Mechanism Based on AFM
p.828
Adaptive Quadrangular Segmentation of Triangle Meshes
p.833
Research on Product Development Process Management for Virtual Enterprise
p.838
Predictive Modeling and Optimization of High Performance Machining
p.842
Path Optimization for EDM of Rimed Turbine Blisks
p.850
Laser Sintering of Reconstituted Nanostructured PSZ Feedstock Powders
p.855
The Development of Virtual Machining System Based on ACIS
p.860
Simulation of Substrate Temperature Distribution in Diamond Films Growth on Cemented Carbide Inserts by Hot Filament CVD
p.864

Predictive Modeling and Optimization of High Performance Machining

Article Preview

Abstract:

High performance machining refers to the material removal operation that delivers the maximum achievable part quality, process competitiveness, and ecological compatibility through strategic utilization of cutters, machine tools, operation configuration, and process parameters. It is rapidly emerging as a prerequisite to productivity and profitability of machining operations and associated manufacturing systems. To accomplish high performance machining, a thorough understanding of the underlying mechanics that affect the performance attributes such as tool life, part integrity, air quality, etc., and how it is attributed to tooling conditions, operation configuration, and process parameters, is required. This paper reviews and summarizes a series of analytical methodologies by coupling with studies performed at the Georgia Institute of Technology for the quantitative modeling of fundamental mechanics of machining in the context of thermal, mechanical, tribological, and metallurgical effects and their interactions. In this study, cutting stresses, residual stress and tool life are explicitly described as functions of tool geometries, cutting speed, chip load, cutting fluid properties, interface tribological conditions, and the cutter/workpiece material constants. These analytical models facilitate the prediction of machining performance thereby allowing the optimal planning of machining processes in pursuing maximum performance. An array of experimental cutting data is also presented in comparison to model-based predictions for the validation of all aspects of the machining mechanics analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
e-Engineering & Digital Enterprise Technology View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 10-12)

Pages:

842-849

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.10-12.842

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2007

Authors:

Steven Y. Liang, Binti M. Abraham

Keywords:

High Performance Machining, Optimization, Residual Stress, Tool Wear

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] A.R. Machado and J. Wallbank: Wear, Vol. 210 (1997), pp.76-82.

Google Scholar

[2] E.K. Henriksen: Residual Stresses in Machined Surfaces. American Society of Mechanical Engineers-Transactions, Vol. 73 (1951), pp.69-76.

Google Scholar

[3] C.R. Liu, and M.M. Barash: Journal of Engineering for Industry, Transactions ASME, Vol. 104 (1982), pp.257-264.

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Xie, et al. NAMRC XVII, 1989, SME.

Google Scholar

[5] F.W. Taylor: Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 28 (1906).

Google Scholar

[6] E. Rabinowicz, L.A. Dunn and P.G. Russell: Wear_Usure-Verschleiss, Vol. 4 (1961), pp.345-355.

Google Scholar

[7] B.M. Kramer, and P.K. Judd: Computational Design of Wear Coatings, 3, Los Angeles, CA, USA, (1985), pp.2439-44.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Kannatey-Asibu: Journal of Engineering for Industry, Transactions ASME, Vol. 107 (1985), pp.81-89.

Google Scholar

[9] F. Klocke, and G. Eisenblaetter: CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 46 (1997), pp.519-526.

Google Scholar

[10] A.R. Machado and J. Wallbank: Wear, Vol. 210 (1997), pp.76-82.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Huang, and S. Y. Liang: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 126 (2004), pp.98-106.

Google Scholar

[12] E. Rabinowicz: Wear Equation for Erosion of Metals by Abrasive Particles, (1979), p.38. 1-38. 5.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Kato, E. Marui and M. Hashimoto: Tribology Transactions, Vol. 41 (1998), pp.341-349.

Google Scholar

[14] J.C. Jaeger: Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, Vol. 76 (1943), pp.203-224.

Google Scholar

[15] K.M. Li: Predictive Modeling of Near Dry Machining: Mechanical Performance and Environmental Impact, Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology (2006).

Google Scholar

[16] P.L.B. Oxley: The Mechanics of Machining: An Analytical Approach to Assessing Machinability. New York: E. Horwood; Halsted Press, (1989), p.242.

Google Scholar

[17] R. Komanduri and Z.B. Hou: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 43 (2001), pp.57-88.

Google Scholar

[18] K.L. Johnson: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (1985).

Google Scholar

[19] D.L. McDowell: Wear, Vol. 211 (1997), pp.237-246.

Google Scholar

[20] D.L. McDowell, G.J. Moyar: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Contact Mechancis and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems(Kingston RI, 1986).

Google Scholar

[21] Y. Jiang and H. Sehitoglu: Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 116 (1994), pp.577-587.

Google Scholar

[22] G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 21 (1985), pp.31-48.

Google Scholar

[23] J.E. Merwin, K.L. Johnson: Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, Vol. 177 (1963), pp.676-685.

Google Scholar

[24] J.C. Su: Modeling of Residual Stresses in a Machining Process, Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology (2006).

Google Scholar

[25] J.D. Thiele and S.N. Melkote: Technical Paper- Society of Manufacturing Engineers, (MR99-167), (1999), pp.1-6.

Google Scholar