Biocompatibility of Phema and P(Hema-Co-Sma) Hydrogels

Article Preview

Abstract:

To replace a poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) sponge, which has limited applications as an implant material, PHEMA and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-sodium methacrylate) (P(HEMA-co-SMA)) hydrogels with enhanced biocompatibility were prepared based on the copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and sodium methacrylate (SMA) at a high monomer concentration. When the cytotoxicity, cell adhesion, and in vivo tissue reaction of the resulting hydrogels were investigated, the results suggest that hydrogels prepared by the copolymerization of HEMA and SMA at a high monomer concentration have great potential as implant materials with an excellent biocompatibility.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 277-279)

Pages:

51-55

Citation:

Online since:

January 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. C. Warren and W. Prins: Macromolecules Vol. 5 (1972), p.506.

Google Scholar

[2] J. S. Calnan, J. J. Pflug, A. S. Chhabra and N. Raghupati: Br. J. Plast. Surg. Vol. 24 (1971), p.113.

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Voldrich, Z. Tomanek, J. Vacik and J. Kopecek: J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Vol. 9 (1975), p.675.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Vijayasekaran, J. H. Fitton, C. R. Hicks, T.V. Chirila, G. H. Crawford and I. J. Constable: Biomaterials Vol. 19 (1998), p.2255.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Rosso, A. Barbarisi, M. Barbarisi, O. Petillo, S. Margarucci, A. Calarco and G. Peluso: Materials Science and Engineering C Vol. 23 (2003), p.371.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-4931(02)00290-4

Google Scholar

[6] S. Alavez, D. Pedroza, J. Moran: Neurochemistry International Vol. 43 (2003), p.581.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Yoshii: J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Vol. 37 (1997), p.517.

Google Scholar

[8] J. H. Lee, J. W. Lee, G. Khang and H. B. Lee: Biomaterials Vol. 18 (1997), p.351.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Werner, S. K. Pandey, M. Escobar-Gomez: Ophthalmology Vol. 107 (2000), p.463.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Werner, S. K. Pandey, D. J. Apple: Ophthalmology Vol. 108 (2001), p.1675.

Google Scholar

[11] M. R. Bet, G. Goissis, S. Vargas and H. S. Selistre-de-Araujo: Biomaterials Vol. 24 (2003), p.131.

Google Scholar

[12] P. B. van Wachem, A. H. Hogt, T. Beugeling, J. Feijen, A. Bantjes, J. P. Detmers and W. G. van Aken: Biomaterials Vol. 8 (1987), p.323.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(87)90001-9

Google Scholar

[13] Q. Qiu, M. Sayer, M. Kawaja, X. Shen and J.E. Davies: J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Vol. 42 (1998), p.117.

Google Scholar

[14] T. A. Horbett, J. J. Waldburger, B. D. Ratner and A. S. Hoffman: J. Biomed. Mat. Res. Vol. 22 (1988), p.383.

Google Scholar