Physico-Chemical Modifications and Biological Improvements of Biomedical PET as a Consequence of Excimer LASER Irradiation

Article Preview

Abstract:

LASER Excimer irradiation can modify surface properties for biocompatibility improvement of a medical device. The PETs from 3 different origins were used in this study. The samples have been irradiated by excimer LASER with 10 different energies. The surface profile, the surface energy and the materials crystallinity have been assessed. Biological characterizations were made with human embryonic epithelial cells L132: proliferation, vitality, viability, adhesion with the p-NPP, and morphology. - The profile measurements allowed to establish the ablation threshold, which was 36 mJ/cm². The surface hydrophilic state increased reciprocally with the irradiation intensity. The gain is 13 %. The irradiated and non-irradiated product has identical cristallinity. PET was shown not to be toxic for L132 cells. Cell proliferation and cell vitality showed dose-dependant increases reciprocal to the irradiation energy (from 88 to 138% with respect to control). The correlation was highly significant (R² = 0,8). SEM micrographs show that the cells are better spread on the surface of irradiated PET than on untreated PET.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 288-289)

Pages:

347-350

Citation:

Online since:

June 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.C. Parodi, J.C. Palmaz and H.D. Barone: Ann Vasc Surg 1991, 5: 491-499.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Buth and R.J.F. Laheij: J Vasc Surg 2000, 31: 134-146.

Google Scholar

[3] L. De Bartolo, S. Morelli, A. Bader and E. Drioli: Biomaterials 2002, 23: 2485-2497.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Watanabe, T. Takata and M. Tsuge: Polym Int 1993, 31: 247-254.

Google Scholar

[5] L.D. Laude, D. Martinez, C. Dicara, F. Hanus and K. Kolev: Nucl Instr and Meth in Phys Res B 2001, 185: 147-155.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lampin, R. Warocquier-Clerout, C. Legris, M. Degrange and M.F. Sigot-Luizard: J. Biomed Mater Res 1997, 36: 99-108.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199707)36:1<99::aid-jbm12>3.0.co;2-e

Google Scholar

[7] J.C. Hornez, A. Lefèvre, D. Joly and H.F. Hildebrand: Biomol. Engineering 2002, 19, 103-118.

Google Scholar

[8] S.A. Redey, M. Nardin, D. Bernache-Assolant, C. Rey, P. Delannoy, L. Sedel and P.J. Marie: J Biomed Mater Res 2000, 50: 353-364.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(20000605)50:3<353::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-c

Google Scholar

[9] P. Linez-Bataillon, F. Monchau, M. Bigerelle and H.F. Hildebrand: Biomol Engineering 2002, 19, 133-142.

DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(02)00024-2

Google Scholar