Paper Titles
Application of Orientation Microscopy in SEM and TEM for the Study of Texture Formation during Recrystallisation Processes
p.3
Texture and Symmetry Relationships in Piezoelectric Materials
p.13
Microstructure Sensitive Design with First Order Homogenization Theories and Finite Element Codes
p.23
The Application of Multiscale Modelling for the Prediction of Plastic Anisotropy and Deformation Textures
p.31
Complexity of the Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility in Single-Phase Deformed, Low-Grade, Cleaved Mudstone
p.45
Crystallographic Control on the Development of Texture in Precipitated Quartz Grains
p.57
Textures in Experimentally Deformed Olivine Aggregates: The Effects of Added Water and Melt
p.63
Joint Inclination Effect on Strength, Stress-Strain Curve and Strain Localization of Rock in Plane Strain Compression
p.69
Development of Nonuniform Substructure and Microstrain Distribution by Texture Formation in Metal Materials
p.77

Complexity of the Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility in Single-Phase Deformed, Low-Grade, Cleaved Mudstone

Article Preview

Abstract:

The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) is often interpreted in terms of strain. However, since AMS is controlled by all magnetic (s.l.) carriers present, an AMS interpretation is not straightforward, especially in the presence of composite magnetic fabrics. Considering the large number of factors that may influence rock mineralogy (e.g. sediment source area, metamorphism), it becomes clear that one cannot interpret AMS in terms of strain without applying additional techniques that allow determining the nature and preferred orientation of all magnetic (s.l.) carriers likely influencing the measured AMS. This is discussed using samples from the Brabant Massif (Belgium) and the Moesian Platform (E-Romania).

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Textures of Materials - ICOTOM 14 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 495-497)

Pages:

45-56

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.495-497.45

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2005

Authors:

Timothy N. Debacker, Manuel Sintubin, Philippe Robion

Keywords:

AARM, AMS, Brabant Massif, Cleavage, Moesian Platform, Strain

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] G. Oertel: Tectonophysics Vol. 100 (1983), 413-447.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Hrouda: Geophysical Surveys Vol. 5 (1982), 37-82.

Google Scholar

[3] G.J. Borradaile and B. Henry: Earth-Science Reviews Vol. 42 (1997), 49-93.

Google Scholar

[4] B.A. Housen, C. Richter and B.A. van der Pluijm: Tectonophysics Vol. 220 (1993), 1-12.

Google Scholar

[5] T.N. Debacker, P. Robion and M. Sintubin: Geological Society, London, Special Publications Vol. 238 (2004), 77-107.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Verniers, A. Herbosch, M. Vanguestaine, F. Geukens, B. Delcambre, J.L. Pingot, I. Belanger, M. Hennebert, T. Debacker, M. Sintubin, and W. De Vos: Geologica Belgica Vol. 4 (2001), 5-38.

DOI: 10.20341/gb.2014.042

Google Scholar

[7] C. McCabe, M. Jackson and B.B. Ellwood: Geophysical Research Letters Vol. 12 (1985), 333- 336.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Jelinek and J. Pokorny: Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Vol. 22 (1997), 179-181.

Google Scholar

[9] V. Jelinek: Tectonophysics Vol. 79 (1981), 63-67.

Google Scholar

[10] G.J. Borradaile: Tectonophysics Vol. 156 (1988), 1-20.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Rochette, M. Jackson and C. Aubourg: Reviews of Geophysics Vol. 30 (1992), 209-226.

Google Scholar

[12] F. Martín-Hernández and A. Hirt: Tectonophysics Vol. 367 (2003), 13-28.

Google Scholar

[13] V. Jelinek: Travaux Géophysiques Vol. 37 (1993), 124-134.

Google Scholar

[14] W. Lowrie: Geophysical Research Letters Vol. 17 (1990), 159-162.

Google Scholar

[15] M. Sintubin, H.R. Wenk, and D.S. Phillips: Materials Science and Engineering Vol. A202 (1995), 157-171.

Google Scholar