Effect of Self-Interstitials – Nanovoids Interaction on Two-Dimensional Diffusion and Activation of Implanted B in Si

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, we investigate the effect of performing a high dose 20 keV He+ implant before the implantation of B at low energy (3 keV) in silicon and the subsequent thermal annealing at 800 °C. The implants were performed in laterally confined regions defined by opening windows in a SiO2 mask, in order to evidence the impact on a realistic configuration used in device fabrication. High resolution quantitative scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM) combined with cross-section transmission electron microscopy (XTEM) allowed to clarify the role of the voids distribution produced during the thermal annealing on the diffusion and electrical activation of implanted B in Si. Particular evidence was given to the effect of the uniform nanovoids distribution, which forms in the region between the surface and the buried cavity layer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 108-109)

Pages:

395-400

Citation:

Online since:

December 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ITRS http: /public. itrs. net.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Pelaz, G. H. Gilmer, H. -J. Gossmann, C. S. Rafferty, M. Jaraìz, and J. Barbolla, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3657 (1999).

DOI: 10.1063/1.123213

Google Scholar

[3] S. Mirabella, E. Bruno, F. Priolo, D. De Salvador, E. Napolitani, A. V. Drigo, and A. Carnera, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 680 (2003).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1594264

Google Scholar

[4] C.C. Griffioen, J.H. Evans, P.C. de Jong and A. van Veen: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B. Vol. 27 (1987), p.417.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Roqueta, D. Alquier, L. Ventura and B. Lopez, Solid State Phenomena, Vols. 82-84 (2002) pp.279-284.

Google Scholar

[6] V. Raineri, M. Saggio, and E. Rimini, J. Mater. Research, 15, 1449 (2000) and references therein.

Google Scholar

[7] V. Raineri and S.U. Campisano, Appl. Phys. Lett., 69, 1783 (1996).

Google Scholar

[8] V. Raineri and S.U. Campisano, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. In Phys. Res. B 120, 56 (1996).

Google Scholar

[9] F. Giannazzo, S. Mirabella, V. Raineri, D. De Salvador, E. Napolitani, A. Terrasi, A. Carnera, A. V. Drigo, and F. Priolo, Phys. Rev. B 161310 (2002).

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.161310

Google Scholar

[10] F. Giannazzo, F. Priolo, V. Raineri and V. Privitera, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2565 (2000).

Google Scholar

[11] D. Goghero, V. Raineri, and F. Giannazzo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1824 (2002).

Google Scholar

[12] F. Giannazzo, D. Goghero, and V. Raineri, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22, 2391 (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] M. -L. David, E. Oliviero, A. Ratchenkova, N.N. Gerasimenko, A. Declemy, J. -F. Barbot, A. van Veen and M.F. Beaufort, Solid State Phenomena, Vols. 82-84 (2002) pp.285-290.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.82-84.285

Google Scholar

[14] F. Cayrel, D. Alquier, D. Mathiot, L. Ventura, F. Roqueta, G. Gaudin and R. Jérisian, Nucl. Inst. Meth. in Phys. Res. B 216 (2004) p.291.

Google Scholar