Search Options

Sort by:

Sort search results by

Publication Type:

Publication Type filter

Open access:

Publication Date:

Periodicals:

Periodicals filter

Search results

Online since: July 2012
Authors: Wei Zhang, Jun Wen Chen, Yong Shen, Zhi Qing Yang, Shi Qing Xie, Sheng Chao Yang
Table 1 Compound of essential oils in different cultivars of A.tsao-ko fruit by GC-MS analysis compounds RI Percentage(%) Ellipse Fusiform Spherical Conical 1 2-hexenal 860 - 0.01 2 2-n-butyl furan 894 0.06 0.10 3 heptanal 896 0.06 0.05 0.07 4 artemesia triene 923 0.07 0.07 5 α- thujene 931 0.10 6 α-pinene 939 0.82 2.84 3.28 1.82 7 β- thujene 976 0.03 2.91 0.07 8 β-pinene 981 1.55 2.14 1.77 6.61 9 α-phellandrene 1005 6.60 1.92 10.28 3.47 10 3-carene 1011 0.59 11 4-carene 1015 1.09 0.99 0.68 12 Terpinen 1020 0.07 13 ocimene 1023 1.48 0.77 14 β-phellandrene 1031 - 0.07 15 1,8-Cineole 1048 35.30 35.73 36.99 36.96 16 1,3,6-Octatriene 1056 0.10 17 2-octenal 1060 0.77 0.02 18 γ-terpinene 1062 2.13 2.17 2.44 2.15 19 Sabinenhydrate 1069 0.07 20 6-octenal,3,7-dimethyl 1153 0.16 21 β-terpineol 1160 0.03 0.10 22 α-Terpineol 1189 7.60 5.43 7.48 8.69 23 citral 1240 15.97 8.22 7.16 6.01 24 linalool 1260 0.30 0.44 0.97 25 cinnamaldehyde,beta-methyl 1285
Online since: July 2013
Authors: Xuan Sheng Hu, Zhen Guo Ji, Hong Xia Li, Jun Zhang, Jun Hua Xi
[15] JI Zhen-Guo, XI Jun-Hua, MAO Qi-Nan,Determination of oxygen concentration in heavily doped silicon wafer by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy, Journal of Inorganic Materials, 25(8) (2010) 893-896
Online since: August 2013
Authors: Hua Jin Shi, Lin Ge Yang, Jun Xia Kang, Zi Qi Zhao, Yong Feng Kang
Vol.89 (2012),p.891–896
Online since: January 2013
Authors: Soo Whan Ahn, Ho Keun Kang, Myung Sung Lee
Heat Transf. 115(1993) 890-896
Online since: June 2014
Authors: Xiao Hui Zhou, Yang Qing Wu, Xiao Ping Lu, Xiao Yu Guo, Wei Wang
[2] Jifeng Ma,Xiuling Wang .Ultrastructures of Pollen and Papillar Cell of Arabidopsis during Pollination, Chinese Journal of Cell Biology 2011, 33(8): 892–896
Online since: December 2014
Authors: Jin Ying Li, Mei Qing Zhang, Chun Lian Zhang
SWOT analysis and strategic choice of Wind power market of Hebei province . science and technology management research, 2010 (8): 84 - 85 [2] Zhang Qiang, the northeast wind energy resources development and the development of wind power industry [J]. resources science, 2008 (6): 896-904 [3] gong de yong ,the discussion of Guizhou biomass energy status and Development Countermeasures, Economic Research Journal, 2010 (28)
Online since: May 2013
Authors: Zhi Yu Wu, Zhao Ying Ren, Shi Yue Wang, Xi Jie Yang
Fig.1 Specimen for Low Cycle Fatigue Fig.2 Specimen for High Cycle Fatigue Table 2 Mechanical Properties of 35CrMo Steel Yield strength /MPa Tensile strength /MPa Section shrinkage /% Elongation /% Shear yield strength /MPa Shear strength /MPa Elastic Modulus /GPa 734 896 65.24 17.5 318 601 204 Results and Analysis for Low Cycle Fatigue Test Cyclic Hardening and Softening Properties.
Online since: July 2013
Authors: Shao Hua Ma, Jie Qiu Bao, Chui Yi Meng, Zhi Yuan Cai
[2] Giuseppe Parise, Luigi Martirano, Robert E.Nabours.Arc-Fault Protection of Branch Circuits, Cords, and Connected Equipment[J].IEEE Transactions on industry applications. 2004,40(3): 896-899
Online since: November 2013
Authors: Yuan Tian, De Tian Wan, Yi Wang Bao, Hua Zhao
., 37: 891-896, 2011
Online since: August 2014
Authors: Xiao Yong Li, Bei Lei Zhao, Cun Yan Cui, Jing Peng Chen, Yun Chun Jiang, Xing Li
Table 4 Blast wave overpressure in two simulation Z (m/kg1/3) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 Distance (cm) 112 224 336 448 560 672 784 896 1008 1120 1232 1344 A 4.94 2.36 1.55 0.954 0.687 0.528 0.418 0.256 0.173 0.132 0.107 0.075 B 4.609 3.373 2.395 1.135 0.594 0.439 0.323 0.243 0.168 0.119 0.087 0.068 C 3.42 2.922 2.013 1.29 0.816 0.515 0.338 0.229 0.175 0.124 0.084 0.063 D 2.51 1.91 1.34 0.94 0.725 0.582 0.47 0.367 0.248 0.161 0.114 0.08 E 1.795 1.239 0.925 0.779 0.568 0.459 0.37 0.318 0.267 0.208 0.166 0.12 A1 4.548 3.236 1.962 1.35 1.019 0.806 0.626 0.486 0.331 0.223 0.152 0.079 B1 6.401 3.4 1.92 1.35 1.019 0.806 0.637 0.486 0.331 0.223 0.152 0.079 C1 4.851 2.606 1.474 1.03 0.809 0.642 0.513 0.411 0.319 0.24 0.187 0.122 D1 2.618 1.6 1.03 0.716 0.499 0.372 0.287 0.218 0.164 0.119 0.083 0.043 E1 1.726 1.1 0.844 0.621 0.423 0.276 0.176 0.109 0.081 0.064 0.051 0.027 Fig.6 Trend of q changes with distance As shown in Fig.6, there is a great difference between two cases.