Comprehensive Post-Evaluation Model on Wind Power

Article Preview

Abstract:

Chinese wind power has undergone a rapid development under the support from government and technology progress, which caused a discordant situation with the backward of its post-evaluation work. Currently, a comprehensive post-evaluation index system and evaluation methods has not been established, the result of current evaluation cannot help the decision-making for the follow-up projects and the further improvement of the operational status of wind farm. However, since the end of 2010, there are more and more problems exposed in wind powers development. It is necessary to develop a comprehensive and scientific post-evaluation on Chinese wind power project. This research contains two parts, the first part constructed a whole-process post-evaluation model on wind power project, the second part developed a target completion degree post-evaluation model from terms of cost, quality, schedule, safety and environment. What is more, the literature about wind power project evaluation was analyzed in this paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

86-92

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yonghong Yang, Xiandong Li, Wind power project evaluation theory, J. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Social Science) 03 (2008) 6-9.

Google Scholar

[2] Youxing Shen, Yanxia Fan, Chuansheng Xie, Assessment study based on the FAHP method of wind power projects, J. Power Demand Side Management 06 (2008) 16-18.

Google Scholar

[3] Aping Zheng, Liqun Luo, Yiqiang Zhang, and Evaluation on wind power project of Zhangpu Liuao Fujian, J. Energy and Environment 04(2008) 81-83.

Google Scholar

[4] Lan Liu, Evaluation index system and evaluation method on wind power project, J. North China Electric Power University 2008.

Google Scholar

[5] Xin Jin, Economic benefits on annual production capacity of one million kilowatts of wind power plant project, J. Jilin University 2008.

Google Scholar

[6] Sheng Li, Wei Jiang, Guoliang Hu, Post-valuation on wind power projects based on ANP, J. Anhui Electric Power 04 (2009) 83-86.

Google Scholar

[7] Huaiwu Peng, Changqing Feng, Fangrui Liu, Post-evaluation on wind farm designing in Inner Mongolia, J. Power Grid and Clean Energy 04 (2009) 97-99.

Google Scholar

[8] Sergio Botero B, Felipe Isaza C, Adriana Valencia, Evaluation of methodologies for remunerating wind power's reliability in Colombia, J. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14(2010) 2049-2058.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.005

Google Scholar

[9] Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt a,b,*, Adrià Junyent-Ferré a, Andreas Sumper a,b, Samuel Galceran-Arellano, Maximum generation power evaluation of variable frequency offshore wind farms when connected to a single power converter, J. Applied Energy 87 (2010) 3103–3109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.025

Google Scholar

[10] Ahmed R. Abul'Wafa, Reliability/cost evaluation of a wind power delivery system, J. Electric Power Systems Research 81 (2011) 873-879.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.11.028

Google Scholar

[11] V. Gass, F. Strauss, J. Schmidt, E. Schmid, Assessing the effect of wind power uncertainty on profitability, J. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 2677–2683.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.024

Google Scholar

[12] Xin Zhao, Shuangxin Wang, Tao Li, Review of Evaluation Criteria and Main Methods of Wind Power Forecasting, J. Energy Procedia 12(2011) 761-769.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.102

Google Scholar

[13] Pan Zhao, Jiangfeng Wang, Junrong Xia, Yiping Dai, Yingxin Sheng Jie Yue, Performance evaluation and accuracy enhancement of a day-ahead wind power forecasting system in China, J. Renewable Energy 43 (2012) 234-241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.051

Google Scholar

[14] Kim J-Y, et al., Site selection of offshore wind farms around the Korean Peninsula through economic evaluation, Renewable Energy (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.renene.2012.08.026.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.026

Google Scholar