Clinical Use of Bioactive Glasses for Maxillo-Facial Repair

Article Preview

Abstract:

Autogenous bone grafts are considered to be the gold standard in maxillo-facial surgery. However, drawbacks of donor site morbidity and unpredictable rates of resorbtion often limit their use. In vivo tests have shown that 45S5 bioactive glass particles placed in critical size bone defects lead to regeneration of new bone that has the structural characteristics and architecture of mature trabecular bone. In vitro tests using primary osteoblast cultures have shown that the bioactive glass particles release ionic dissolution products that provide genetic stimuli that control osteoblast cell cycles and lead to rapid growth of mineralized bone nodules. These in vitro and in vivo results led to approval of use of bioactive glass particles and monolithic bioactive glass implants for use in maxillo-facial reconstructions after removal of bone cysts and trauma, as described by several case histories.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

73-84

Citation:

Online since:

March 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Urist, M. R., Mikulski, A., & Boyd, S.D. A chemosterilized antigen extracted autodigested alloimplant for bone banks, Arch. Surg. Vol. 110 pp.416-427 (1975).

DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360100058011

Google Scholar

[2] Sennerby, L & Lundgren, S. Histologic aspects of stimultaneous implant and graft placement' In: 'The Sinus Bone Graft, Jensen O.T. (Ed), Quintessence Chapter 8 (1998).

Google Scholar

[3] Aspenberg, P., Kalebo, P., Alberktsson, T. Rapid bone healing delay by bone matrix implantation, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 3, pp.123-127 (1988).

Google Scholar

[4] Oberg. S. & Rosenquist, J.B. Bone healing after implantation of hydroxyapatite granules and blocks (Interpore 200) combined with autolyzed antigen extracted allogenic bone and fibrin glue', Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 23, pp.110-114 (1994).

DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80604-6

Google Scholar

[5] Hollinger, J.O., Schmitz, J.P., Mark, D.E., & Seyfer, A.E. Osseous wound healing with xenogenic bone implants with a biodegradable carrier, Surgery 107 pp.50-54 (1990).

Google Scholar

[6] Schmitz, J.P. & Hollinger, J.O. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 205 pp.299-308 (1986).

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198604000-00036

Google Scholar

[7] Hollinger, J.O. & Kleinschmidt, J.C. The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials, J. Craniofacial Surg. 1 pp.60-68 (1990).

DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199001000-00011

Google Scholar

[8] Jensen, O.T. Greer R.O., Johnson, L., Kassebaum, D. Vertical guided bone grafts augmentation in a new canine mandibular model, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 7 pp.62-71 (1995).

DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199600510-00030

Google Scholar

[9] Nishibori, M, Betts, N.J., Salama, H. & Listgarten, M.A. Short term healing of autogenous and allogenic bone grafts after sinus augmentation: A report of 2 Cases, J. Periodontol, 65 pp.958-966 (1994).

DOI: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.10.958

Google Scholar

[10] Oonishi H, Kushitani S, et al. Bone growth into spaces between 45S5 Bioglass granules. In: Bioceramics, Volume 7 (Proceedings of the 7 th International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine, Turku, Finland, July 1994). Ed: Andersson OH, Yli-Urpo A. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd 1994: Vol 7: 139-144 (1994).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-042144-5.50025-x

Google Scholar

[11] Oonishi, H, Kin, N., Wakitani, S., Imoto, K., Hench, L. Wilson, J. Sugihara. T, Tsuji, E. Comparison of bone growth behavior into spaces between different bioceramic materials of various sizes, 9 th Cimtec World forum on new materials symposium XI materials in clinical applications P. Vincenzini Eds Techna, Sri, pp.411-418 (1999).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199901)44:1<31::aid-jbm4>3.0.co;2-9

Google Scholar

[12] Kent, J.N., Quinn, J.H., Zide, M.F. et al Correction of alveolar ridge deficiencies with nonresorbable hydroxyapatite, J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 105 p.993 (1982).

DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0405

Google Scholar

[13] Griffiths, J.R. New hydroxyapatite ceramic materials 'Potential use for bone induction and alveolar ridge augmentation, J. Prosthet. Dent. 53 p.109 (1985).

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90078-2

Google Scholar

[14] Silverberg, M. Singh, M. Gans, B et al Polyglycolic acid mesh contained hydroxylapatite for augmentation of bone in the rat, Proc. 9 th Int. Conf. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 145 p.52 (1986).

DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90225-9

Google Scholar

[15] Gongloff, R.K. Montgomery, C.K. Lee, R. et al, Collagen tubes: Role in subperiosteal contour augmentation, Int. J. Oral. Maxillo. Surg. 15 p.669 (1986).

DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80107-7

Google Scholar

[16] Barsan, R. E & Kent J.N. Hydroxylapatite reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiency with an open technique-a preliminary report, Oral Surg. 59 p.113 (1985).

DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90001-5

Google Scholar

[17] Gongloff R.K., Use of collagen tube contained implants of particulate hydroxyapatite for ridge augmentation, J. Oral & Maxillofac. Surg. 46 (8) pp.641-647 (1988).

DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(88)90106-1

Google Scholar

[18] Collins, T.A. Use of collagen tubes containing particulate hydroxlapatite for augmentation of the edentulous atrophic maxilla: A preliminary report, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 47, (2), pp.137-141 (1989).

DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(89)80103-x

Google Scholar

[19] Blonk, M.S., Kent. J.N., Ardoin, R.C. et al Mandibular augmentation in dogs with hydroxylapatite combined with demineralized bone, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 45 p.414 (1987).

DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90009-7

Google Scholar

[20] Hench, L. and Polak,J. A Genetic Basis for Development of new Biomedical Materials, Science, (2001).

Google Scholar

[21] Thompson, I. & Hench, L. Medical application of composites, In Comprehensive Composite Materials (2000) Eds Kelly, A. & Zweben, C. Elsevier Science Vol 6 Pages 727-753.

DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-042993-9/00191-1

Google Scholar

[22] Thompson, I. & Hench, L. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, glass-ceramics and composites, Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs, Vol. 212 part H. pp.127-136 (1998).

DOI: 10.1243/0954411981533908

Google Scholar

[23] Chan, C., Thompson, I., Robinson, P., Wilson, J. & Hench,L. Evaluation of a Bioglass - dextran composite as a bone graft substitute, I.J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Vol 31, pp.73-77 (2002).

DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0143

Google Scholar

[24] Wheeler , D.L., Eschbach , E.J., Hoellrich , R.G., Montfort, M.J., Chamberland, D.L. Assessment of resorbable bioactive material for grafting of critical-size cancellous defects, J Orthop Res. 2000 Jan ; 18 (1): 140-8 10716290.

DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100180120

Google Scholar