Residual Stress State and Fatigue Behaviour of Laser Shock Peened Titanium Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

Laser shock peening is a very effective mechanical surface treatment to enhance the fatigue behaviour of highly stressed components. In this work the effect of different laser shock peening conditions on the residual stress depth profile and fatigue behaviour without any sacrificial coating layer is investigated for two high strength titanium alloys, Ti-6Al-4V and Timetal LCB. The results show that the optimization of peening conditions is crucial to obtain excellent fatigue properties. Especially, power density, spot size and coverage severely influence the residual stress profile of laser shock peened Ti-6Al-4V and Timetal LCB specimens. For both alloys, subsurface as well as surface compressive residual stress peaks can be obtained by varying the peening conditions. In general, Timetal LCB exhibits steeper stress gradients than Ti-6Al-4V for identical peening conditions. The main parameters affecting the fatigue life are near-surface cold work and compressive residual stresses.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 524-525)

Pages:

129-134

Citation:

Online since:

September 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I. Altenberger, In: Handbook on Residual Stress - 2 nd Edition (Ed. J. Lu), Society for Experimental Mechanics, 2005, p.137.

Google Scholar

[2] I. Chida, M. Yoda, N. Mukai, Y. Sano, M. Ochiai, T. Miura, R. Saeki, In: Proc. of the 13 th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-13) Beijing, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] J.J. Ruschau, R. John, S.R. Thompson, T. Nicholas: Int. J. Fatigue, 21 (1999) (1999).

Google Scholar

[4] I. Altenberger, In: Proc. of the 9 th Int. Conf. on Shot Peening (Ed. A. Niku-Lari), IITT, Marne La Vallee, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] C.S. Montross, T. Wei, L. Ye, G. Clark, Y.W. Mai: Int. J. Fatigue 24 (2002) 1021.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Mukai, N. Aoki, M. Obata, A. Ito, Y. Sano, C. Konagai: Proc. 3 rd JSME/ASME Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-3); Kyoto, 1995, 1489.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Sano, M. Obata, T. Kubo, N. Mukai, M. Yoda, K. Masaki, Y. Ochi: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 417 (2006) 334.

Google Scholar

[8] O. Schauerte, D. Metzner, R. Krafzig, K. Bennewitz, A. Kleemann: ATZ 103 (2001) 654.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03226229

Google Scholar

[9] R.K. Nalla, I. Altenberger, U. Noster, G.Y. Liu, B. Scholtes, R.O. Ritchie: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355 (2003) 529.

Google Scholar

[10] B. Scholtes, E. Macherauch: Z. Metallkunde 77 (1986) 322.

Google Scholar

[11] I. Altenberger, Y. Sano, I. Nikitin, B. Scholtes: Int. Congress on Fatigue. Atlanta, 2006, in press.

Google Scholar

[12] J.O. Peters, G. Lütjering, R. Nalla, I. Altenberger, R.O. Ritchie, In: Fatigue 2002 (Ed. A. F. Blom), EMAS, Stockholm, 2002, p.1763.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Kiese, J. Zhang, O. Schauerte, L. Wagner, In: Shot Peening (Ed. L. Wagner), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003, p.381.

Google Scholar