Functionalization of Biomaterials

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to improve the tissue integration and subsequently the long-term maintenance, the implant surface can be modified by mechanical, physical, chemical or biological functionalization. In this way, the surface becomes biologically active by further grafting of biomolecules. Two principal concepts are considered for materials functionalization. (i) The Drug Delivery Systems (DDS) where the bioactive molecules goes to the target. (ii) The grafting of the bioactive compounds on small strongly bound spacer molecules. In this system, the target goes to the bioactive molecules. These techniques provide promising outlooks for any polymeric or ceramic scaffold used in tissue engineering for the construction of whole artificial and functional organs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 288-289)

Pages:

47-50

Citation:

Online since:

June 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Linez-Bataillon, F. Monchau, M. Bigerelle and H.F. Hildebrand: Biomol Engineering 2002, 19, 133- 142.

DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(02)00024-2

Google Scholar

[2] E. Eisenbarth, J Meyle, W Nachtigall and J Breme: Biomaterials 1996, 17, 1399-1403.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)87281-4

Google Scholar

[3] J. Breme, E. Eisenbarth and H.F. Hildebrand: Calcium Phosphate Materials - Fundamentals, Saurampsmédical, Montpellier, (ISBN: 2-84023-173-5) 1998, pp.139-151.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.M. Zhang, P. Bataillon-Linez, P. Huang, Y.M. Zhao, Y. Han, M. Traisnel, K.W. Xu and H.F. Hildebrand: J Biomed Mater Res 2004, 68A, 383-291.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.20063

Google Scholar

[5] C. Dupas-Bruzek, L. D Laude and C. Dicara: Appl. Surface Science 2002, 186, 124-129.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(01)00607-9

Google Scholar

[6] C. Dupas-Bruzek, L. D Laude, F. Langenhorst and K. Kolev: J. Appl. Physics 2003, 93, 4489-4496.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1555703

Google Scholar

[7] D.H. Kaelble and J. Moacanin: Polymer 1977, 18, 475-482.

Google Scholar

[8] S.A. Redey, M. Nardin, D. Bernache-Assolant, C. Rey, P. Delannoy, L. Sedel and P.J. Marie: J Biomed Mater Res 2000, 50, 353-364.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(20000605)50:3<353::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-c

Google Scholar

[9] M. Lampin, R. Warocquier-Clerout, C. Legris, M. Degrange and M.F. Sigot-Luizard: J Biomed Mater Res 1997, 36, 99-108.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199707)36:1<99::aid-jbm12>3.0.co;2-e

Google Scholar

[10] E. Eisenbarth, P. Linez, V. Biehl, D. Velten, J. Breme, H.F. Hildebrand: Biomol Engineering 2002, 19, 233-238.

DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(02)00028-x

Google Scholar

[11] S. Hatton, J.D. Andrade, J.B. Hibbs Jr, D.E. Gregonis and R.N. King: J Colloid Interface Sci 1985, 104, 73-81.

Google Scholar

[12] H.F. Hildebrand, Ph. Rocher, F. Monchau and E. Delcourt-Debruyne: Biomaterialien, 2002, 3, 14-20.

DOI: 10.1515/biomat.2002.3.1.14

Google Scholar

[13] H. Petite, V. Frei, A. Huc and D. Herbage: J Biomed Mat Res 1994, 28, 159-165.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Weltrowski, M. Morcellet and B. Martel: patent FR 99/01967 (1999) - PCT/FR00/00378(2000) - US 09 913, 448 (2001).

Google Scholar

[15] B. Martel, M. Morcellet and M. Weltrowski patent PCT/FR00/00377 (2000) - US 09/913, 475 (2001).

Google Scholar

[16] B. Martel, M. Morcellet, D. Ruffin, L. Ducoroy and M Weltrowski: J. Incl. Phen. Macr. Chem. 2002, 44, 443-446. 17. O. Melnyk, X. Duburcq, C. Olivier, F. Urbès, C. Auriault and H. Gras-Masse: Bioconjug. Chem., 2002, 13, 713-720.

DOI: 10.1021/bc015584o

Google Scholar

[18] F. Urbès, J. -S. Fruchart, H. Gras-Masse and O. Melnyk: Letters in Peptide Science, 2002, 8, 253-258.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1016233214565

Google Scholar