Feedback Searching Bias and Measurement of its Effect on Ant Colony Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

One of the obstacles in applying ant colony optimization (ACO) to the combinatorial optimization is that the search process is sometimes biased by algorithm features such as the pheromone model and the solution construction process. Due to such searching bias, ant colony optimization cannot converge to the optimal solution for some problems. In this paper, we discover and define a new type of searching bias in ACO named feedback bias. We empirically prove the existence of feedback bias and its influence on ACO. We also present the concept of intensity of bias as a measurement of the effect on ACO by such bias. Our experimental results show that it is reasonable and reliable to use the intensity to measure the influence of bias on ACO.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

[1] Dorigo M, Stützle T, Ant Colony Optimization, MIT Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[2] Dorigo M, Blum C, Ant colony optimization theory: A survey, Theoretical Computer Science, 344 (2005) 243-278.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2005.05.020

Google Scholar

[3] Blum C, Ant colony optimization: Introduction and recent trends, Physics of Life Reviews, 2 (2005) 353-373.

DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2005.10.001

Google Scholar

[4] Shtovba S, Ant Algorithms: Theory and Applications, Programming and Computer Software, 31(2005) 167-178.

DOI: 10.1007/s11086-005-0029-1

Google Scholar

[5] Agarwal A., Lim M. H., Er M. J., Chew C. Y., ACO for a new TSP in region coverage, Proceedings of Intelligent Robots and Systems 2005, 2-6 Aug. (2005) 1717 – 1722.

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2005.1545460

Google Scholar

[6] Blum C, Beam-ACO—hybridizing ant colony optimization with beam search: an application to open shop scheduling, Computers & Operations Research, 32(2005) 1565-1591.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2003.11.018

Google Scholar

[7] Prokopenko M, Peter Wang, Foreman M, Valencia P, Price D, Poulton G, On connectivity of reconfigurable impact networks in ageless aerospace vehicles, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 53(2005)36-58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2005.06.003

Google Scholar

[8] Kuo R.J., Wang H.S., Hu T. L. , Chou S.H., Application of ant K-means on clustering analysis, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 50 (2005) 1709-1724.

DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.05.009

Google Scholar

[9] R.J. Kuo, Y.P. Kuo, Kai-Ying Chen, Developing a diagnostic system through integration of fuzzy case-based reasoning and fuzzy ant colony system, Expert Systems with Applications, 28(2005)783-797.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.034

Google Scholar

[10] Katangur, A.K., Akkaladevi S., Pan, Y., Fraser, M.D., Applying ant colony optimization to routing in optical multistage interconnection networks with limited crosstalk, Proceedings of 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004, pp.26-30.

DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2004.1303156

Google Scholar

[11] Shyong Jian Shyu, B.M.T. Lin , Tsung-Shen Hsiao, Ant colony optimization for the cell assignment problem in PCS networks , Computers & Operations Research, 33(2006)1713-1740.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2004.11.026

Google Scholar

[12] Maniezzo V., Carbonaro A., An ANTS heuristic for the frequency assignment problem, Future Generation Computer Systems, 16(2000)927 – 935.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-739x(00)00046-7

Google Scholar

[13] Kalinli A., Karaboga N., Artificial immune algorithm for IIR filter design,  Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 18(2005)919-929.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2005.03.009

Google Scholar

[14] Talbi E. -G., Roux O., Fonlupt C., Robillard D., Parallel Ant Colonies for the quadratic assignment problem, Future Generation Computer Systems, 17(2001)441-449.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-739x(99)00124-7

Google Scholar

[15] Gambardella L. M., Dorigo M., Ant Colony System hybridized with a new local search for the sequential ordering problem, INFORMS Journal on Computing, 12(2000)237–255.

DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.12.3.237.12636

Google Scholar

[16] Lee Z.J., Lee C.Y., Su S. F, An immunity-based ant colony optimization algorithm for solving weapon-target assignment problem, Applied Soft Computing, 2(2002)39-47.

DOI: 10.1016/s1568-4946(02)00027-3

Google Scholar

[17] Blum C., Sampels M., Ant colony optimization for FOP shop scheduling: A case study on different pheromone representation, in Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2002, vol. 2, pp.1558-1563.

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2002.1004474

Google Scholar

[18] Blum C, Sampels M. When model bias is stronger than selection pressure, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature(PPSN'02), London, UK , Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp.893-902.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45712-7_86

Google Scholar

[19] Merkle D, Middendorf M. Modeling the dynamics of ant colony optimization algorithms, Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 10(3) : 235 - 262.

DOI: 10.1162/106365602760234090

Google Scholar

[20] Merkle D, Middendorf M. Modeling ACO: composed permutation problems, Proceedings of ANTS2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2002, 2463: 149-162.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45724-0_13

Google Scholar

[21] Montgomery J, Randall M, Hendtlass T. Solution bias in ant colony optimization: Lessons for selecting pheromone models, Computers and Operations Research, 2008, 35(9): 2728-2749.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.12.014

Google Scholar

[22] Montgomery J, Randall M, Hendtlass T. Structure advantages for ant colony optimization inherent in permutation scheduling problems, Proceedings of IEA/AIE , LNAI, 2005, 3533, : 218-228.

DOI: 10.1007/11504894_31

Google Scholar