Spatial Soil Pressure Test and Calculation Analysis of Sheet-Pile Wall

Article Preview

Abstract:

The conventional methods used in the design of sheet-pile walls are based on the limit equilibrium approach. Due to a flexible retaining system, the choice of soil pressure needs to be further studied. Test about sheet-pile wall was carried out on typical site. Soil pressure distribution rules on horizontal and vertical direction were revealed by comparing the on-site measured and numerical data with classical soil pressure data. The results show that: the soil pressure resultant force of anchored sheet-pile is close to static soil pressure, and its action point is 0.43~0.44, higher than the static soil pressure (0.33). The resultant force and its action point of soil pressure of cantilever sheet-pile wall are close to the ones of coulomb soil pressure. In horizontal direction, there present “arching effect” on this two kinds of sheet-pile walls. Therefore, the current soil pressure calculation methods of sheet-pile walls should be revised according to different types, and an amended calculation method of soil pressure was proposed in this paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1040-1047

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] King GWJ. Analysis of cantilever sheet-pile walls in cohesionless soils[J]. Journal geotechnical engineering 1995, 121(9): 629-35.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1995)121:9(629)

Google Scholar

[2] Madabhushi SPG, Chandrasekaran VS. Rotation of cantilever sheet pile walls[J]. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2005, 131(2): 202-12.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:2(202)

Google Scholar

[3] FU Hai-ying, HE Chang-rang. Prototype measurements of a new pre-stressed sheet-pile retaining wall [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(9): 1050-1054. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Deng zong-wei, Leng wu-ming, Nie ru-song, et al. Soil Pressure Test and spatial Calculation Analysis of Bridge Abutments of High-Speed Railway [J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(6): 37-41. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Joseph G. Bentler, A.M. ASCE and Joseph F. Labuz, M. ASCE. Performance of a Cantilever Retaining Wall[J]. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2006(8): 1062-1070.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1062)

Google Scholar

[6] Kristian Krabbenhoft , Lars Damkilde and Sven Krabbenhoft. Ultimate limit state design of sheet pile walls by finite elements and nonlinear programming[J]. Computers and Structures 2005 (83): 383-393.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.016

Google Scholar

[7] Lyamin AV, Sloan SW. Lower bound limit analysis using non-linear programming[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 2002, (55): 573-611.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.511

Google Scholar

[8] Krabbenhoft K, Damkilde L. A general nolinear optimization algorithm for lower bound limit analysis[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 2003, (56): 165-84.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.551

Google Scholar

[9] S. P. Gopal Madabhushi and V. S. Chandrasekaran. Rotation of Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls[J]. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2005(2): 202-212.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:2(202)

Google Scholar

[10] Li Guang-hai. New retaining structure design and engineering example [M]. Beijing: China communication Press, 2004. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Yong Tan , Ye Lu. Parametric studies of DDC-induced deflections of sheet pile walls in soft soils[J]. Computers and Geotechnics 2009 (36): 902-910.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.01.004

Google Scholar

[12] Tan Y. FE-analysis of highway construction in peat bog[J]. Canada Geotechnical Journal 2008, 45(2): 147-60.

Google Scholar

[13] Yong Tan and Samuel G. Paikowsky. Performance of Sheet Pile Wall in Peat[J]. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2008 (4): 445-458.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2008)134:4(445)

Google Scholar

[14] Leung EHY, Ng CWW. Wall and ground movements associated with deep excavations supported by cast in situ wall in mixed ground conditions. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2007, 133(2): 129-43.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2007)133:2(129)

Google Scholar

[15] Teruo, Nakai, Hossain Md. Shahin, Eunsu Sung, et al. 3D effects in excavation problems model tests and mumerical simulations[A]. Geomechanics 2005, ASCE 2006: 407-426.

DOI: 10.1061/40870(216)27

Google Scholar

[16] Shubhra Goel1, N. R. Patra. Effect of arching on active earth pressure for rigid retaining walls considering translation mode [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2008, 8(2), 123-133.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1532-3641(2008)8:2(123)

Google Scholar