Collapse Pattern Identification for Cable-Stayed Bridges Based on Ultimate Limit Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

A method based on ultimate limit analysis (ULA) was proposed to identify collapse pattern for cable-stayed bridges. The proposed method had no need to model the whole process of structural progressive failure, but assumed plastic hinge model of cable-stayed bridges, which had two sets of variables describing plastic hinges’ positions and rotational angles. By a two-stage sequential optimization, the variables could be solved to reveal the bridge collapse pattern. Parametric studies could be further conducted to identify the bridge critical components, and explore the effects of some design parameters on collapse pattern and ultimate load-carrying capacity (ULC). The proposed technique was illustrated on a twin-pylon cable-stayed bridge. Comparing with the results of nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA), the yielded components forming collapse pattern can be correctly extracted from the plastic hinge model. This technique results in small errors (less than 3.1%) for estimating the ULCs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1149-1158

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] United States Department of State Publication Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism: Country Reports on Terrorism 2007 (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] J.T. Pinto, D.I. Blockley and N.J. Woodman: Structural Safety, Vol.24 (2002) No.2-4, p.107.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Agarwal, D. Blockley and N. Woodman: Structural Safety, Vol. 25 (2003) No.3, p.263.

Google Scholar

[4] E.B. Williamson and D.G. Winget: Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol.10 (2005) No.1, p.96.

Google Scholar

[5] B.W. Schafer and P. Bajpai: Engineering Structures, Vol.27 (2005) No.11, p.1642.

Google Scholar

[6] M.G. Steward: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol.22 (2008) No.2, p.115.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Ettouney, R. Smilowitz, M. Tang and A. Hapij: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, Vol.20 (2006) No.4, p.403.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Bousshine, A. Chaaba and G.D. Saxce: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 44 (2002) No. 11, p.2189.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(02)00135-2

Google Scholar

[9] A. Giordano, A.D. Luca, E. Mele and A. Romano: Engineering Structures, Vol.29 (2007) No.9, p.2109.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Kotelko: Thin-Walled Structures, Vol.42 (2004) No.2, p.153.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Caporale, R. Luciano and L. Rosati: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol.196 (2006) No.1-3, p.247.

Google Scholar

[12] G.A. Drosopoulos, G.E. Stavroulakis and C.V. Massalas: Engineering Structures, Vol.28 (2006) No.13, p.1864.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Jirásek and Z.P. Bažant: Inelastic analysis of structures (England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2002).

Google Scholar

[14] P. Thoft-Christensen and Y. Murotsu: Application of structural Systems reliability theory (Springer, Berlin 1986).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-82764-8

Google Scholar

[15] C. Honigmann and D.P. Billington: Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 8 (2003) No.3, p.122.

Google Scholar