Blast Wave Effect on Apparatus and Propagation Laws in Dry Sand in Geotechnical Centrifuge Model Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

7 geotechnical centrifuge model tests for buried explosion in dry sand were investigated by using 450 g-t geotechnical centrifuge apparatus. Blast wave effect on apparatus and propagation laws in dry sand were studied under the conditions of different explosive charges and different centrifuge acceleration levels. 11 accelerometers were buried around the explosives for recording the acceleration response in sand. Other 1 accelerometer was installed on the centrifuge arm to monitor blast wave effect on centrifuge apparatus. The results demonstrate that: The effect of blast wave on centrifuge apparatus can be ignored. The peak acceleration is a power increasing function of the acceleration level. An empirical relation of exponent can be found between the proportional peak acceleration and the proportional distance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

626-629

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. N. TAYLOR. Geotechnical centrifuge technology. London: Blackie Academic and Professional, 1995.

Google Scholar

[2] W. H. Craig. Edouard Phillips (1821–1889) and the idea of centrifuge modeling. Géotechnique, Vol. 39 (1989), p.697.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1989.39.4.697

Google Scholar

[3] R. M. Schmidt and K. A. Holsapple. Theory and experiments on centrifuge cratering. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol.85 (1980), p.235.

DOI: 10.1029/jb085ib01p00235

Google Scholar

[4] G. I. Pokrovsky and I. S. Fyodorov. Centrifugal Model Testing in the Construction industry. Vol. I, II, Niedra. Publshing House, Moscow (1969).

Google Scholar

[5] G. I. Pokrovsky and I. S. Fyodorov. Impact and explosion effects in a deformable medium. Beijing: China industry press. (1965) (Chinese edition, translated by Liu Qingrong and Huang Wenbin)

Google Scholar

[6] R. M. Schmidt and K. R. Housen. Some recent advances in the scaling of impact and explosion cratering. International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 5 (1987), p.543.

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(87)90069-8

Google Scholar

[7] K. A. Holsapple and R. M. Schmidt. A material-strength model for apparent crater volume. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 10th (1979), p.2757.

Google Scholar

[8] K. A. Holsapple and R. M. Schmidt. Point-source solutions and couplinhg parameters in cratering mechanics. Journal of Geophysical Research.Vol.92 (1987) No. B7, p.6350.

DOI: 10.1029/jb092ib07p06350

Google Scholar

[9] K. R. Housen, R. M. Schmidt and K. A. Holsapple. Crater ejecta scaling laws: Fundamental forms based upon dimensional analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 88 (1983), No. B3, p.2485.

DOI: 10.1029/jb088ib03p02485

Google Scholar

[10] A. J. Piekutowski. Formation of bowl-shaped crater. Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 11th(1980), p.2129.

Google Scholar

[11] C. P. Lin, D. J. Goodings, L. E. Bernold and R. D. Dick. Modeling studies of effects on lunar soil of chemical explosions, ASCE, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 120 (1994), No.10, p.1684.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1994)120:10(1684)

Google Scholar

[12] M. C. R. Davies. Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction Resulting from Blasting Loading, Centrifuge 94, Leung, Lee& Tan(eds.), Rotterdam, Bakema(1994), p.319.

Google Scholar