Security Analysis of Concast and Anycast Digital Signature

Cheng Lian Liu; Yong Ning Guo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.121-126.1177

Paper Titles

The Research on Image Segmentation Based on the Minimum Error Probability Bayesian Decision Theory
p.1151

The Research on Macro Charged Jet Phenomenon and its Orderly Collection
p.1156

The Visual Sense Creation Strategy of Natatorium Arena which Consideration to Leisure
p.1160

Top-Layer Design and Systematic Design of Products
p.1164

Security Analysis of Concast and Anycast Digital Signature
p.1177

Visual Psychology and View Methods in Modern Calligraphy Education
p.1183

An Intelligent Lane Markers Recognition and Localization System Using Improved Hough Transform
p.1186

RETRACTED: A Deadlock Prevention Using Adjacency Matrix on Dining Philosophers Problem
p.1191

The Research on Modeling of Design of Product
p.1196

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 121-126Security Analysis of Concast and Anycast Digital...

Security Analysis of Concast and Anycast Digital Signature

Abstract:

In the above paper a conception has been proposed which is a variant of the ElGamal-type digital signature. It considers the problem of authentication in the concast and anycast communication model. This paper proposed an improvement of concast scheme and also given a forgery attack on the anycast scheme. The authors state signature scenario scheme as follows.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Frontiers of Manufacturing and Design Science II

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 121-126)

Pages:

1177-1182

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.121-126.1177

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Cheng Lian Liu, Yong Ning Guo

Keywords:

Asymmetric Cryptography, Discrete Logarithm, Factorization, RSA Algorithm

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] M. Al-Ibrahim, H. Ghodosi, and J. Pieprzyk: Authentication of Concast Communication. INDOCRYPT'02 (2002) , p.185–198.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36231-2_16

Google Scholar

[2] M. Al-Ibrahim and A. Cerny: Authentication of Anycast Communication. Mathematical Methods, Models, and Architectures for Computer Network Security (MMM-ACNS) (2003), p.419–423.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45215-7_36

Google Scholar

[3] Kan Zhang: Threshold Proxy Signature Schemes. Information Security Workshop (1997), p.191–197.

Google Scholar

[4] K. U. M. Mambo and E. Okamoto: Proxy Signature: Delegation of the Power to Sign Message. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences Vol. E79-A:9 (1996), p.1338–1354.

Google Scholar

[5] D. R. Stinson: Attack on a concast signature scheme. Information Processing Letters Vol. 91:1(2004), p.39–41.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ipl.2003.12.010

Google Scholar

[6] Wikipedia. Anycast scheme. Wikipedia website (2010). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Liu: Improvement of Authentication of Anycast Communication. The International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST) 2009, p.1–3.

DOI: 10.1109/icitst.2009.5402618

Google Scholar

[8] Concast. http://protocols.netlab.uky.edu/~mullins/acast/concast.html. 07/21/2011.

Google Scholar