Effect of Input Shaping on Response of Inertia Plants

Article Preview

Abstract:

A poorly designed control system can lead to excessive residual vibration and long setting time. This paper investigates the effect of input shaping on control efficiency. To perform this investigation, we design a PD controller combined with input shaping for an inertia plant. We then subject it to four standard types of inputs. The responses of the control systems are described by analytical expressions. The performances of PD control and PD combined with input-shaping control are thoroughly analyzed and compared. Simulation results show that PD feedback control enhanced with input shaping minimizes overshoot and setting time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2676-2680

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] O. J. M. Smith, Posicast Control of Damped Oscillatory Systems, Proceedings of the IRE, pp.1249-1255(1957).

DOI: 10.1109/jrproc.1957.278530

Google Scholar

[2] W. E. Singhose, Command Generation for Flexible Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts(1997).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Alli and T. Singh, On the Feedback Control of the Wave Equation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 234, no. 4, p.625–640(2000).

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2893

Google Scholar

[4] A. Banerjee, N. Pedreiro and M. Gonzalez, Simultaneous Optimization of Input Shaping and Feedback Control for Slewing Flexible Spacecraft, in American Control Conference, (Denver, CO), p.4796–4798(2003).

DOI: 10.1109/acc.2003.1242481

Google Scholar

[5] L. Pao and C. La-orpacharapan, Shaped Time-Optimal Feedback Controllers for Flexible Structures, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 126, p.173–186 (2004).

DOI: 10.1115/1.1637639

Google Scholar

[6] M. Kenison and W. Singhose, Concurrent Design of Input Shaping and Feedback Control for Insensitivity to Parameter Variations, in Sixth Int. Work-shop on Advanced Motion Control, (Nagoya, Japan)(2000).

DOI: 10.1109/amc.2000.862896

Google Scholar

[7] M. Kenison and W. Singhose, Concurrent Design of Input Shaping and Proportional Plus Derivative Feedback Control, ASME J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, no. September(2002).

DOI: 10.1115/1.1486009

Google Scholar

[8] J. W. Huey and W. Singhose, Concurrent Dsign of Input Shaping and PD Feedback Control for an Inertia Submitted to Elsevier, 16 Sept(2007).

Google Scholar

[9] J. R. Huey, K. L. Sorensen and W. Singhose, Useful Applications of Closed-Loop Signal Shaping Congtrollers, Preprint submitted to Control Engineering Practice(2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.09.004

Google Scholar

[10] W. Singhose, R. Eloundou and J. Lawrence, Input Shaping and Command Smoothing, Submitted to ASME JDSMC(2007).

Google Scholar