The Process DNA Model of Significant Model Project

Article Preview

Abstract:

To solve the problem of “two command line” existing in the significant model project management at present, this paper proposes a method of process DNA-based process management for significant model project. First, the technology process and management process of significant model project are analyzed. Second, the process DNA double-strand of significant model project is constructed employing the elements of technology and management as building blocks; and also, the two-level structure of the process DNA double-strand is analyzed. Third, the process DNA model of significant model project is established and the related formal definitions are given.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

504-508

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhang Jie, Yan Zhenguo, Li Yuan. Method of integrating schedule control on aviation manufacturing projects. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2008, 44(26): 230~232, 241.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang Shupeng. Space model project management research. Science & Technology Information, 2008, 1: 162.

Google Scholar

[3] Xiong Dandan, Huai Bin, Hou Xudong. AVPLAN: the model project management system for Military Industry. Manufacture information Engineering of China, 2008, 2: 72~73.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhao Menglin, Xiong Daode, Song Shengpan et al. Information of Aviation Product Development Project Management. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology. 2010, 3: 70~73.

Google Scholar

[5] Du Bin, Qiu Wanhua. Research on Spaceflight Project Resource Equalization Model Based on Three Dimensions Hierarchical Risk Entropy. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2008, 25(10): 122~124.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Wikström, K. Artto, J. Kujala, et al. Business models in project business. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, 28(8): 832-841.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.001

Google Scholar