Chance Constrained Model Predictive Control Based on Set-Valued Optimal Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper adopts one kind of classical predictive control, namely model algorithmic control, to control the distillation process. Due to finite cognition degree for the distillation system and existence noise in the chemical industry, we present a chance constrained model predictive control algorithm to eliminate the effect of parameter pertubation and noise. In view of the linear impulse response model, we introduce set-valued optimal algorithm and orthogonal standardization method to transform the chance constrained model predictive control to a general model predictive control problem. For the determinate MPC, efficient quadratic programming exsits to solve such problem. Applying such controller to a distillation system, output constraint condition will be satisfied with a predefined probability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

148-155

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. M. Maciejowski, Predictive Control with Constraints, Prentice Hall, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] P. O. M. Scokaert and D. Q. Mayne, Min–Max Feedback Model Predictive Control for Constrained Linear Systems, IEEE TRANSACTION ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 43(8): 1136-1142, (1998).

DOI: 10.1109/9.704989

Google Scholar

[3] A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper, Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing Under Chance Constraints, Operations Research, 11(1): 18-39, (1963).

DOI: 10.1287/opre.11.1.18

Google Scholar

[4] A. T. Schwarm and M. Nikolaou, Chance-Constrained Model Predictive Control, AIChE Journal, 45(8): 1743-1752, (1999).

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690450811

Google Scholar

[5] P. Li, M. Wendt and G. Wozny, Robust model predictive control under chance constraints, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 24: 829-834, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0098-1354(00)00398-7

Google Scholar

[6] D. H. van Hessem and O. H. Bosgra, A conic reformulation of Model Predictive Control including bounded and stochastic disturbances under state and input constraints, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 4643-4648, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2002.1185110

Google Scholar

[7] J. Yan, R. R. Bitmead, Incorporating stateestimation into model predictive control and its application to network traffic control, automatic, 41: 595-604, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.11.022

Google Scholar

[8] L. Blackmore, A Probabilistic Particle Control Approach to Optimal, Robust Predictive Control, Model-based Embedded and Robust Systems, (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Cannon, D. Ng and B. Kouvartakis, Successive Linearization NMPC for a Class of Stochastic Nonlinear Systems, Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, LNCIS 384: 249-262, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01094-1_20

Google Scholar

[10] C. H. Hong, X. N. Gong, Hasofer-Lind reliability index calculation under correlation conditions, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 21(1): 68-75, 2000. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Q. X. Shen, Y. Zhang, G. Y. Wang, A Set-valued Model and the Solution for the Chance-constraints Stochastic Programming, J. Harbin Arehit. and Civ. Eng. Inst, 27(2): 9-17, 1994. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] S. Skogestad, and I. Postlethwaite, Multivariable Feedback Control. Multivariable Feedback Control, Wiley, Chichester, UK, (1996).

Google Scholar