Heuristics for Domain-Independent Planning: A Survey

Article Preview

Abstract:

Increasing interest has been devoted to Planning as Heuristic Search over the years. Intense research has focused on deriving fast and accurate heuristics for domain-independent planning. This paper reports on an extensive survey and analysis of research work related to heuristic derivation techniques for state space search. Survey results reveal that heuristic techniques have been extensively applied in many efficient planners and result in impressive performances. We extend the survey analysis to suggest promising avenues for future research in heuristic derivation and heuristic search techniques.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

573-577

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Helmert M. 2003. Complexity results for standard benchmark domains in planning. Artificial Intelligence 143(2): 219~262.

DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(02)00364-8

Google Scholar

[2] Fikes, R. Nilsson, N. 1971. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2: 189-208.

DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(71)90010-5

Google Scholar

[3] International Planning Competition Archives official website: http: /ipc. icaps-conference. org.

Google Scholar

[4] Bonet, B., Geffner, H. Planning as Heuristic Search. 2001. Artificial Intelligence 129: 5-33.

DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00108-4

Google Scholar

[5] Hoffmann, J. and Nebel, B. 2001. The FF planning system: Fast plan generation through heuristic search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14: 253-302.

DOI: 10.1613/jair.855

Google Scholar

[6] Helmert, M. 2006. The fast downward planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26: 191-246.

DOI: 10.1613/jair.1705

Google Scholar

[7] Richter, S. and Westphal, M. The LAMA planner: Guiding cost-based anytime planning with landmarks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2010, 39: 127-177.

DOI: 10.1613/jair.2972

Google Scholar

[8] Haslum, P.; Bonet, B.; and Geffner, H. 2005. New admissible heuristics for domain-independent planning. In Proc. AAAI 2005, 1163–1168.

Google Scholar

[9] Edelkamp, S. 2001. Planning with pattern databases. In Proc. ECP 2001, 13–24.

Google Scholar

[10] Karpas, E., & Domshlak, C. 2009. Cost-optimal planning with landmarks. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), p.1728–1733.

Google Scholar

[11] Helmert, M.; Haslum, P.; and Hoffmann, J. 2007. Flexible abstraction heuristics for optimal sequential planning. In Proc. ICAPS 2007, 176–183.

Google Scholar

[12] Katz, M., and Domshlak, C. 2009. Structural-pattern databases. In Proc ICAPS 2009, 186–193.

DOI: 10.1609/icaps.v19i1.13351

Google Scholar

[13] Katz, M., and Domshlak, C. Implicit Abstraction Heuristics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2010, 39: 51-126.

DOI: 10.1613/jair.3063

Google Scholar

[14] Katz, M., & Domshlak, C. (2010). Optimal admissible composition of abstraction heuristics. Artificial Intelligence, 174, 767–798.

DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.04.021

Google Scholar

[15] Hoffmann J and Porteous J and Sebastia L. Ordered landmarks in planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2004, 22: 215-278.

DOI: 10.1613/jair.1492

Google Scholar

[16] Karpas, E., & Domshlak, C. (2009). Cost-optimal planning with landmarks. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-09), p.1728–1733, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Google Scholar

[17] Domshlak, C., Katz, M., & Lefler, S. 2010. When abstractions met landmarks. In Proc ICAPS 2010, p.50–56.

DOI: 10.1609/icaps.v20i1.13409

Google Scholar