Performance Comparison of Neighborhood Based Broadcasting Methods in MANETs

Article Preview

Abstract:

Neighborhood based broadcasting methods for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) is a kind of simple and efficient broadcasting methods. Many neighborhood based broadcasting methods have been proposed in recent years, but there has been no comparison. How to select an appropriate broadcasting method is still a problem. The performances of three typical neighborhood based broadcasting methods (Flooding with Self Pruning, Scalable Broadcasting Approach and Ad Hoc Broadcast Protocol) were compared using Qualnet. Various scenarios with different network load and mobility were designed to evaluate these three methods. Delivery rate of packets, the number of rebroadcasting nodes and end-to-end delay were considered as the performance measures. The comparison charts show that Ad Hoc Broadcast Protocol is a good choice for the heavy load MANETs with low mobility, and Scalable Broadcasting Approach is more appropriate to the high mobility MANETs. The results can give a reference for the practical construction of MANETs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

678-683

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Johnson, D. Maltz and Y. Hu, The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad hoc Networks, Internet Draft: draft-ietf-manet-dsr-09. txt, (2003).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc4728

Google Scholar

[2] C. Perkins, E. Beldig-Royer and S. Das, Ad Hoc on Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, Request for Comments 3561, July (2003).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc3561

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Haas and M. Pearlman, The Performance of Query Control Schemes for the Zone Routing Protocol, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 9(4), p.427–438, (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/90.944341

Google Scholar

[4] I.S. Committee. Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer specifications. In IEEE 802. 11 Standards. IEEE, New York, 1997. ISBN 1-55937-935-9.

DOI: 10.1109/ieeestd.1997.85951

Google Scholar

[5] H. Lim and C. Kim, Multicast Tree Construction and Flooding in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks", Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems(MSWIM, 00), 2000, pp.61-68.

DOI: 10.1145/346855.346865

Google Scholar

[6] W. Peng and X. Lu, On the Reduction of Broadcast Redundancy in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks", Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing( MobiHoc, 00), IEEE Press, April 2002, v. 1 n. 2, p.111–123.

DOI: 10.1109/mobhoc.2000.869221

Google Scholar

[7] W. Peng and X. Lu, AHBP: An Efficient Broadcast Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, Journal of Science and Technology, Beijing, China, vol. 16(2), p.114–125, (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02950416

Google Scholar