Effect of Biological Organic Fertilizer on Plant Growth and Yield of Chinese Kale

Article Preview

Abstract:

A substrate culture experiment was conducted to study the effect of different biological organic fertilizer levels (control: zero fertilization, low level, medium level and high level) on plant growth and yield of Chinese kale (Brassica alboglabra Bailey). Results showed that compared with control, treatments of medium and high fertilization increased the leaf number, plant height, stem diameter, yield and plant dry matter of Chinese kale. Thus they promoted plant growth. The fertilizer utilization ratio of Chinese kale was the lowest for low fertilization treatment, and it was the highest for medium fertilization treatment, while it was decreased for high fertilization treatment. The treatment of medium level fertilization (30g/plant) promoted plant growth and increased the yield of Chinese kale; also it had the highest fertilizer use efficiency. So it was the appropriate organic fertilization amount for Chinese kale production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

175-179

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. P. Larkin and T. S. Griffin. Crop Prot. Vol. 26 (2007), pp.1067-1077.

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Wei, X. M. Yang, S. X. Yin, Q. R. Shen, W. Ran and Y. C. Xu. Appl. Soil Ecol. Vol. 48 (2011), pp.152-159.

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Y. Cen X. L. Luo, J. Su, H. X. Xie, M. Q. Chi, Y. L. He, Y. Yan, and Y. H. Pan. Chinese Agric. Sci. Bull. Vol. 22 (2006), pp.202-206.

Google Scholar

[4] B. Pavla and R. Pokluda. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. Vol. 36 (2008), pp.63-67.

Google Scholar

[5] E. Termine, D. Lairon, B. Taupier-Letage, S. Gautier, R. Lafont and H. Lafont. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. Vol. 37 (1987), pp.321-332.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01092208

Google Scholar

[6] R. Verkerk, M. Schreiner, A. Krumbein, E. Ciska, B. Holst, I. Rowland, R. De Schrijver, M. Hansen, C. Gerhuser and R. Mithen. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. Vol. 53 (2009), pp.219-265.

DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200800065

Google Scholar

[7] G. K. Cassman, S. Peng, D. C. Olk, J. K. Ladha, W. Reichardt, A. Dobermnan and U. Singh. Field Crop Res. Vol. 56 (1998), pp.7-39.

Google Scholar

[8] N. K. Fageria and V. C. Baligar. J. Plant Nutr. Vol. 26 (2003), pp.1315-1333.

Google Scholar

[9] A. M. Mujahid and A. J. Gupta. Indian J. Agr. Sci. Vol. 80 (2010), pp.177-181.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Citak and S. Sonmez. Sci. Hortic. Vol. 26 (2010), pp.415-420.

Google Scholar

[11] C. Sousa ,D. M. Pereira and J. A. Pereira. J. Agr. Food Chem. Vol. 56 (2008), pp.2231-2239.

Google Scholar