Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biogas Production from Straw

Article Preview

Abstract:

A cost combined life cycle assessment was carried out to estimate the economic and environmental impact of biogas production from corn straw. Results showed that the pipeline transport, electricity, and chemicals production stages represented the dominant contribution to environmental impact in most mid-point categories, whereas infrastructure, waste treatment, pipeline transport, and raw materials (e.g., straw, chemicals, coal, diesel) price played an important role to economic impact. Results indicate that it is very difficult to develop the technology of straw for biogas production in China in case without a national financial support. In addition, optimizing the efficiency of raw material consumption and decreasing the pipeline transport distance are effective way to decrease the both overall environmental and economic burden.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

688-691

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Asia Biomass Handbook. http: /jie. or. jp/biomass/AsiaBiomassHandbook /English.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Zhao, Y. Leng, H. Ren and H. Li: Life cycle assessment for large-scale centralized straw gas supply project, J. Anhui Agri. Sci. Vol. 38 (2010),   pp.19462-19464 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Wang, W. Kou and Y. Bian: Analyses on the distribution pattern of the crop-straw Resource and benefit analysis of straw for biogas production, Liaoning Urban and Rural Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 29 (2009), pp.39-41.

Google Scholar

[4] M.J. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs and R. Van Zelm, ReCiPe: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, First edition report I: Characterisation, (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] A.M. De Schryver, K.W. Brakkee, M.J. Goedkoop and M. Huijbregts: Characterization factors for global warming in life cycle assessment based on damages to humans and ecosystems, Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 43(2009), pp.1689-1695.

DOI: 10.1021/es800456m

Google Scholar

[6] C. Fen and X. Ma: Life cycle assessment of the straw generation by direct combustion, ACTA Energiae Solaris China Vol. 6 (2008),   pp.711-715 . (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Huang and Y. Wu: Environmental benefit of electricity generated by natural gas, J. Fuzhou Uni. Vol. 37(2009), pp.147-150 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] L. Ma, Z. Wang, X, Gong and Z, Nie: Life cycle inventory analysis of two types of freight transport on city roads, Conference of Chinese materials research, Beijing, 2006. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Ecoinvent Centre: Ecoinvent data v2. 0 Final Reports Ecoinvent 2000 No. 1-15: Swiss centre for life cycle inventories, Dubendorf, CH, 2007. http: /www. ecoinvent. ch.

Google Scholar

[10] X. Di, Z. Nie, B. Yuan and T. Zuo: Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China, Int. J. LCA. Vol. 12 (2007), pp.217-224 (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.1065/lca2007.05.331

Google Scholar

[11] J. Hong, J. Zhou: Economic and Environmental Assessment of Straw Direct-fired Power Generation, Applied Mechanics and Materials. In Press.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Li: Hebei Qing county operation mode of straw biogas project and management experience, New Energy IND Vol. 8 (2010), pp.9-13 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar