Hybrid RANS–LES Modeling for Unsteady Cavitating Flow Simulation

Guo Hua Gao; Jing Zhao; Fei Ma; Wei Dong Luo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.152-154.1187

Paper Titles

A Driver Fatigue Recognition Model Based on Visual Information and Bayesian Network
p.1165

The Warping Defect Control with Tension Leveling in Continuous Galvanizing Line
p.1172

An Investigation on Speedometer Pointer Residual-Value of Crashing Vehicle and its Application in Accident Reconstruction
p.1177

Modal Analysis of Dynamically Tuned Gyroscope Based on ANSYS11.0
p.1183

Hybrid RANS–LES Modeling for Unsteady Cavitating Flow Simulation
p.1187

Study on Vehicle Emissions Dispersion in Asymmetrical Street Canyons and Proper Location of Air Intake for Ventilation System
p.1191

Side Scan Sonar Modeling for Maritime Robotic Operations
p.1195

Calculation for Circulating Velocity in Curved Channel
p.1202

Mechanical and Creep Properties of the Cast Magnesium Alloy
p.1207

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 152-154Hybrid RANS–LES Modeling for Unsteady Cavitating...

Hybrid RANS–LES Modeling for Unsteady Cavitating Flow Simulation

Abstract:

A typical hybrid RANS-LES approach, DES (Detached Eddy Simulation), was introduced into cavitating flow simulation in this paper. The applicability of two DES models, including one equation DES model and SST k-ω DES model, and standard k-ε model was analyzed through experimental data of a water tunnel experiment. Validation results illustrate that the precision of DES method depends on the RANS model used and the length scale used to distinguish LES zone and RANS zone. The SST k-ω DES method can well predict cavitating flow. The averaged results gained through this model are better than those of standard k-ε or one equation DES model. By comparison, the one equation DES model shows little advantage than standard k-ε model to simulate cavitating flow.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 152-154)

Pages:

1187-1190

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.152-154.1187

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2012

Authors:

Guo Hua Gao, Jing Zhao, Fei Ma, Wei Dong Luo

Keywords:

Cavitating Flow, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), RANS-LES Model, Unsteady

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] J. Wu. Doctoral dissertation of University of Florada (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] R.T. Knapp, J.W. Daily and F.G. Hammitt. Cavitation, McGraw-Hill, New York （1970）.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Jochen, D. Terzi. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 44 (2008), pp.349-377.

Google Scholar

[4] P. R Spalart, W.H. Jou, et al. In: Proceedings of first AFOSR international conference on DNS/LES, Ruston, Louisiana. Greyden Press (1997), pp.4-8.

Google Scholar

[5] F.R. Menter, M. Kuntz. In: McCallen, R., Browand, F., Ross, J. (eds. ) Symposium on . the aerodynamics of heavy vehicles: trucks, buses and trains. Monterey, USA (2002), pp.2-6.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85070-0

Google Scholar

[6] A. K. Singhal, M. M. Athavale, Li Huiying, et al.J. Fluid Engineering. Vol. 124(3) (2002), pp.617-624.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Y. Wang, I. Senocak and W. Shyy. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. Vol. 37(2001), pp.551-581.

Google Scholar