Effects of PCL Deficient on Biomechanics of Knee's Cartilage and Menisci at Different Flexion Angles

Article Preview

Abstract:

To investigate the response of PCL rupture on the biomechanics of cartilage and menisci, the MRI images of normal human knee at various flexion angles(0°,25°,60° and 80°)were developed 1.5T and the intact and PCL deficient knee models were built based on these images. Then three different loads were applied on these models for the finite element simulation to obtain the von Mises equivalent stress of cartilages and menisci and the reaction force among them. Based on the four flexion angles finite element simulation in ANSYS11.0, we drew the conclusions that: (1) the reaction forces and equivalent stresses were sensitive to PCL deficient at 0° and 60° degrees, (2) The reaction force and equivalent stress of the lateral components increased at 0° and 60°, while the medial components increased at 0 degree and decreased at 60 degree after PCL deficient.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1153-1158

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Johnson JC, Bach BR Jr. : American Journal of Knee Surgery 3 (1993), p.143 –153.

Google Scholar

[2] Hughston JC, Andrews JR, Cross MJ, et al: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 58 (1976), p.173 –179.

Google Scholar

[3] Skyhar MJ, Warren RF, Ortiz GJ, et al: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery(Am) 75 (1993), pp.694-699.

Google Scholar

[4] P. MacDonald, A. Miniaci, P. Fowler, et al: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 3 (1996), pp.252-255.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01466628

Google Scholar

[5] N.A. Ramaniraka, A. Terrier, N. Theumann, et al: Clinical Biomechanics 20(2005), p.434–442.

Google Scholar

[6] Trumer C H, Cowin S C, Rho J Y, et al. The Fabric Dependence of the Orthotropic Elastic Constants of Cancellous bone [J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 1990, 23: 549-561.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90048-8

Google Scholar

[7] Duchemin L, Bousson V, Raossanaly C, et al: Medical Engineering & Physics 30 (2008), pp.321-328.

Google Scholar

[8] Pena E, Calvo B, Martinez M A, et al: Biomechanics 39 (2006), pp.1686-1701.

Google Scholar

[9] Weiss J.: Computer Methods and Applications in Mechanical Engineering 135 (1996), pp.107-128.

Google Scholar

[10] Pena E, Martinez M A, Calvo B, et al: Clinical Biomechanics 20 (2005), pp.636-644.

Google Scholar

[11] Moglo K E, Shirazi-Adl A. : Journal of Biomechanics, 38 ( 2005), pp.1075-1083.

Google Scholar

[12] Tammy L, Haut D, Hull M L, et al: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 124 (2002), pp.273-279.

Google Scholar