Effect of Load Carriage on the Backpack Vibration System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Vibration causes many problems in human health, comfort and performance. While walking with a backpack, movement of the backpack relative to the body causes a vibration which behaves like a spring that moves up and down following the motion of the body. In order to analyse the backpacks response to trunk motion, a backpack vibration system has been developed in this study. A model of a backpack-human trunk system, which is represented by a mass-spring system with a damper, and a Fourier series as an external force, is used to describe the motion of the vibration system. The vibration system was analysed using constant values of damping and spring stiffness (c =1 and k = 5) but with different values of the mass of the backpack. Increasing the mass of the backpack from 10% of body weight to 15 and 20% of body weight increased the amplitude of both the displacement and velocity of the backpack vibration system. However, the frequencies of the vibration system decreased as the mass of the backpack increased.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

295-299

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Knapik, E. Harman and K. Reynolds: Applied Ergonomics Vol. 27(3) (1996), p.207.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Holewijn: European Journal of Applied Physiology Vol. 61 (1990), p.237.

Google Scholar

[3] W. Chansirinukor, D. Wilson, K. Grimmer and B. Dansie: Australian Journal of Physiology Vol. 47 (2001), p.110.

Google Scholar

[4] H. A. Orloff and C. Rapp: The effects of load carriage on spinal curvature and posture, Spine 29(12) (2004), p.1325.

DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000127185.74191.b1

Google Scholar

[5] J.X. Li and Y. Hong: Changes of trunk position and breathing pattern in children walking under conditions of load carriage, Scientific Proceedings of the XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports, San Francisco (2001) p.177.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Hong and C.K. Cheung: Gait and Posture Vol. 17 (2003), p.28.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Negrini, R. Carabalona and P. Sibilla: Lancet Vol. 354(9194) (1999), p. (1974).

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04520-1

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Hong and G. -P. Brueggemann: Gait and Posture Vol. 11 (2000), p.254.

Google Scholar

[9] X. S. Xu, D.E. Welcome, T.W. McDowell, J.Z. Wu, B. Wimer and C. Warren: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Vol. 41 (2011), p.418.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Nelisse, S. Patra, S. Rakheja, J. Boutin and P.E. Boileau: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Vol. 38 (2008), p.457.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Ren, R. K. Jones and D. Howard: Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 38 (2005), p.853.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Foissac, G.Y. Millet, A. Geyssant, P. Freychat and A. Belli: Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 42 (2009), p.125.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.012

Google Scholar

[13] R.P. Pelot, A. Rogby, J.M. Stevenson and J.T. Bryant: A static biomechanical load carriage model, Preceedings of NATO RTO Meeting 56: Innovations in load carriage system design and evaluation, Kingston, Canada (2000), pp.25-1.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Feenstra, J. Granstrom and H. Sodano: Mechanical System and Signal Processing Vol. 22 (2008), p.721.

Google Scholar