Numerical Simulation of Ultimate Capacity of Suction Caisson Foundations by FEM

Article Preview

Abstract:

As a newly developed type of foundation for deep water offshore and marine engineering, the suction caisson is usually subjected to combined loading of vertically uplift load, horizontal load and moment. Performance evaluation and design theory for such a new type of foundation can not meet the basic requirements of engineering practice sufficiently at present. In this paper, the general-purpose finite element analysis package ABAQUS is employed to conduct three-dimensional numerical analyses on load-carrying features of suction caisson foundation. Then the ultimate bearing capacity of suction caisson foundation under monotonic load for two drainage conditions of the soil is evaluated by displacing-controlling procedure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3478-3481

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Deng, W., Carter, J.P., A theoretical study of the vertical uplift capacity of suction caissons. Proceeding of the Tenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, (2002), pp.342-349.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhu C. H., Computation of earth pressure on large diameter cylinder under service ultimate state. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.24(2002) , pp.313-318. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Qinglai Fan: A study on stability of deeply-embedded large-diameter cylindrical stricture in soft ground. Ph.D. Thesis, Dalian University of Technology(2006). (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] R. E. Olson, R. B. Gilbert: Suction caisson: Model Tests(2004).

Google Scholar

[5] El-Gharbawy, Sherif L: The pullout capacity of suction foundations. University of Texas, Austin, August (Olson)(1998).

Google Scholar

[6] Aubeny C. P., Han S. W., Murff J. D. Inclined load capacity of suction caissons. International Journal for Numerical and Analysis Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 27(2003) , pp.1235-1254.

DOI: 10.1002/nag.319

Google Scholar