Moral Risk Analysis of Construction Project Cost Management Incentive Mechanism

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cost management of construction project has experienced business accounting type, and control type management stage. But as the construction market becoming more mature, and the market-based products more competitive, now the cost management of construction project enters into the value creation management stage. If the construction enterprises only focus on target cost and responsibility cost management, it is difficult to carry out value creation effectively. This paper discusses how to adopt active incentive mechanism to encourage the agent to play initiative better and create more value under the circumstance of moral risk, determine the expected utility maximization parameters for construction project through the model optimization. This study found that incentive mechanism not only can make the agent more hard-working, but also is beneficial to improving the quantity of construction project. Finally, by providing numerical examples and analyzing the influence of variations of relevant parameters in incentive model, this paper has got comparatively satisfying results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3228-3234

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ZHANG Wei-ying.Game Theory and the Economics of Information. pp.238-239.Shanghai People's Publishing House(1997)

Google Scholar

[2] Wang Linfeng. Inner Mongolia Science Technology & Economy. Vol. 04 (2006), pp.78-79 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Bengt Holmstrom. European Economic Review. Vol. 17 (1982) , pp.127-148

Google Scholar

[4] Kim S K, Wang S S. Journal of Economic Theory. Vol. 82 (1998) , pp.342-378.

Google Scholar

[3] Mirrlees J A. Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 66 (1999) , pp.3-21

Google Scholar

[6] SUN Youfa. The reciprocal of a normal distribution and the Securities gains abnormity of reason . Decision-making and statistical, Vol. 05 (2007), pp.21-22.

Google Scholar

[7] Liu Hai-tao, WEI Ru-xiang. Research on Target Cost Incentive Pricing based on Principal-agent Theory. 2010 Interactional Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering. Beijing:IEEE, pp.266-269.

DOI: 10.1109/fitme.2010.5655602

Google Scholar

[8] LI Li-jun, HUANG Xiao-yuan. Journal of Northeastem University (Natural Science), Vol. 10, (2003) , pp.937-939.

Google Scholar

[9] Prajit K.Dutta. Strategies and Game: Theory and Practice. MIT press (1999)

Google Scholar

[10] Qin Xuan. Engineering Science, Vol. 09 (2007), pp.45-49. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Carsten Homburg. Accounting Research, Vol. 12, (2001).

Google Scholar

[12] LU Shao-kai1,HE Xian-fen2,and YAO Yan-fei. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, Vol. 25, (2008) , pp.55-60. ( in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] Jon Broome, John Perry. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20, (2002) , pp.59-66

Google Scholar

[14] Weng Dongfeng,He Zhouting. China Civil Engineering Joural, Vol. 43, (2010) , pp.139-143

Google Scholar