Green Roofs System with Porous Ecological Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because of its durability and strength, more and more porous concrete has been used for riverbank protection or foundations of greenery. This study described a new type of green roof system without a soil layer on the porous concrete. This paper also discussed reuse of waste (fly ash generated from thermal power stations and aggregate made of ALC panel waste) to configure a newly proposed thin-type green roof system. As a result, the pilot model of lightweight thin type porous planting foundation satisfied the dynamic strength and ensured 30% void ratio needed for viability of vegetation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

966-969

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hongzhu Quan. Study on the Coexistence of Porous Ecological Concrete with Plants. Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 311-313, pp.1551-1554, (2011)

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.311-313.1551

Google Scholar

[2] M. Tamal, T. Matsukawa. Properties and application of environmentally friendly porous concrete, Proc. of CANMET/ACI/JCI 4th International congress, pp.123-140, (1998)

DOI: 10.14359/6035

Google Scholar

[3] K. Yanagibasi, T. Yonezawa. Properties and Performance of Green Concrete, Proc. of CANMET/ACI/JCI 4 th International Congress, 141-158, 1998.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Ishikawa, K. Yanagibashi. An Application of Plantable Porous Concrete on Step Cut Slope, AIJ Journal of Technology and Design, No 14, pp.69-72, (2000)

Google Scholar

[5] T. Horiguchi, A. Hoyano. A New System for Roof-top Planting and Its Thermal Characteristics, Proc. of the International Conference on Concrete in the Service of Mankind. E & FN SPON, London, p.213~224, 1996.

Google Scholar

[6] Japan Concrete Engineering Association: Porous concrete void ratio test methods (draft), Eco-concrete study commission report, pp.54-56, 1995.11.

Google Scholar