The Cooperation and Coordination Game of Constructing Low-Carbon Green Oil Port

Abstract:

Constructing low-carbon green oil port is not only beneficial to change the present situation of Chinese oil port which has pollution problems and many risks, but also to increase the economic efficiency and improve the ability of sustainable development of low-carbon green oil port. While coordinating the cooperative relationship between each related enterprises participated in the construction of oil port low-carbon green oil port, is the important segment to build a low-carbon green oil port. This paper adopted the static game model under the asymmetric circumstance to research cooperative relations of low-carbon green oil port between the oil port enterprises and other enterprises and achieved good research achievements. The study results can provide for oil port supply chain related enterprise whether you choose cooperative strategy with the theory basis and the reference for decision.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 178-181)
• Pages: 1036-1040
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.178-181.1036
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Hou Ming Fan, Guo Song Dong, Xiao Nan Zhang
• Keywords: Cooperation, Game, Low Carbon Green, Oil Port

References

[1] Donghong Feng. Research on port cargo organization and coordination mechanism based on the cooperative game. Dalian Maritime University. 2010. in Chinese.

[2] Xun Wang, Jinxian Chen. Game analysis of the formation mechanism of partnership in the supply chain. Statistics and Decision. 2008(07): 66-68. in Chinese.

[3] Mahesh Nagarajan, Greys Sosic. Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research.2008（187）：719–745.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.045

[4] Yingxue Zhao, Shouyang Wang, T.C.E. Cheng, Xiaoqi Yang, Zhimin Huang. Coordination of supply chains by option contracts: A cooperative game theory approach. European Journal of Operational Research.2010（207）：668–675.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.017

[5] Xiangzhi Zhuo, Xu Wang, Zhengfeng Wang. Evolutionary game research of Supply chain coalition partners relationship. Computer Engineering and Applications. 2010 (1): 208-210. in Chinese.

[6] Kirsten Schliephake, Graeme Stevens, Simon Clay. Making resources work more efficiently – the importance of supply chain partnerships. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (2009) 1257–1263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.020

[7] Hennart J F.A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal，1988，9：361-374.

DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250090406

[8] Kydd A. Trust building，trust breaking：The dilemma of NATO enlargement [J].International Organization，2001（4）：801-828.

DOI: 10.1162/002081801317193600

[9] Shang Shiqiang, Ji Jianhua. Supply chain partnership modeling and self-execution analysis based on the relational contracts. Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University. 2005(03): 479-483. in Chinese.

[10] Jiuhe Wang. The structure analysis and optimization of the port enterprise supply chain. Yanshan University. 2007. in Chinese.

[11] Na Zhao, Haihai Zhu, Huanbiao Chen, Guangxi Sun. Coordination system of port supply chain based on Agent. Marine Traffic Engineering. 2009 (02): 57-59. in Chinese.