Selection and Impact Mechanism of Washing Agents for Chromium Contaminated Building Waste

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the building wastes contaminated by chromium in Haibei Chemical Plan in China as objects, it studied the contents of total Cr and Cr (Ⅵ) of different sizes, analyzed the effect of 6 different washing agents, discussed the removal mechanisms of 6 different washing agents for Cr in various forms, and finally selected applicable washing agent. As the results, particle size had little impact on the contents of total Cr and Cr (Ⅵ); after one washing with water, the removal rate of total Cr and Cr (Ⅵ) was 75% and 78%, respectively, and after the second washing with 6 agents, the removal rate of citric acid was the highest, above 90% for total Cr and above 99% for hexavalent chromium; the pH of building wastes were reduced by citric acid, and under acid condition, hexavalent chromium was reduced to trivalent chromium spontaneously by organic acid, which led to better removal rate of acid soluble Cr and reducible Cr; due to the complexing action, citric acid had best removal rate for oxidizable trivalent chromium. In conclusion, citric acid is the most applicable second washing agent for building wastes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1083-1092

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. Liu, X.R. Wang, Z.Q. Zhang, Potential influences of pH and organic matter on the occurrence form s of chromium in chromium-contaminated soils, Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 4(2010)1436-1440.

Google Scholar

[2] X.R. Wang, X. Liu, X.H. Yan, Q. Wang, Selection of Washing Agents for Remediation of Chromium Slag-Contaminated Soil, Research of Environmental Sciences, 23(2010)1405-1409.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Dermont, M. Bergeron, G. Mercier, Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications, Hazard Materi, 152(2008) 1-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.043

Google Scholar

[4] F. Khan, T. Husain, R. Hejazi, An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies, Environ Manage, 71(2004) 95-122.

Google Scholar

[5] D.K. Elgh, Z. Arwidsson, Camdzija, Laboratory and pilot scale soil washing of PAH and arsenic from a wood preservation site: changes in concentration and toxicity, Hazard Materi, 172(2009)1033-1040.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.092

Google Scholar

[6] R.A. Griffiths, Soil-washing technology and practice, Hazard Materi, 40(1995)175-189.

Google Scholar

[7] H.B. Li, P.J. Li, T.H. Sun, Remediation of Sediment Contaminated by Cd and Pb in Zhangshi Irrigation Area Using a Washing Technology, Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 24(2005)328-332.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Makino, K. Sugahara, Y. Sakurai, Remediation of cadmium contamination in paddy soils by washing with chemicals: selection of washing chemicals, Environ Pollut, 144(2006)2-10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.01.017

Google Scholar

[9] S. Kuo, M.S. Lai, C.W. Lin, Influence of solution acidity and CaCl2 concentration on the removal of heavy metals from metal-contaminated rice soils, Environ Pollut, 144(2006)918-925 .

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.001

Google Scholar

[10] C. Mulligan, S. Wang, Enviromental application for biosurfactants, Environ Pollut, 133(2005)183-198.

Google Scholar

[11] J.X. Zhou, Z. Liu, Recent Developments In The Remediation Of Chromium-contaminated Soil, Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 1(2000) 51-55.

Google Scholar

[12] Q.R. Zeng, S. Sauve, H.E. Allen, Recycling EDTA solutions used to remediate metal polluted soils, Environ Pollut, 133(2005)225 -231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.006

Google Scholar

[13] S.P. Tampouris, Removal of contaminant metals from fine grained soils, using agglomeration, chloride solutions and pile leaching techniques, Hazard Materi, B84(2001)297-319.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(01)00233-3

Google Scholar

[14] M. Lee, I. S. Paik, W. H. Do, Soil washing of As-contaminated stream sediments in the vicinity of an abandoned mine in Korea, Environ Geochem Health, 29(2007)319-329.

DOI: 10.1007/s10653-007-9093-1

Google Scholar

[15] P. Bhattacharya, G. Jacks, S. Nordqvist, Metal contamination at a wood preservation site characterisation and experimental studies on remediation, Sci Total Environ, 290(2002)165-180.

DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01073-7

Google Scholar

[16] US EPA. Method 3060A alkaline digestion for hexavalent chromium[EB/OL]. Washington DC: United States Environment Protection Agency,1996[2011-10-10]. http: / / www. epa. gov /osw / hazard / test methods / sw846 / pdfs /3060a. pdf.

Google Scholar

[17] GB 5085.3-2007, Identification standards for hazardous wastes-Identification for extraction toxicity[S], 2007.

Google Scholar

[18] Z.H. Ding, X. Hu, Application of chelants in remediation of heavy metals-contaminated soil, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 18(2009) 777-782.

Google Scholar