About the Structural Robustness of Through Arch Bridges

Article Preview

Abstract:

In EN1991-1-7 Eurocode 1: Part 1-7 Accidental Actions structural robustness is defined as ‘the ability of a structure to withstand events like fire, explosions, impact or consequences of human error without being damaged to an extent disproportionate to the original cause’. Accordingly, the principle of structural robustness is that local damage is acceptable, provided that it will not endanger the structure and that the overall load-carrying capacity is maintained during an appropriate length of time to allow the necessary emergency measures to be taken. For different structures the practical ways to achieve robustness are different. Lots of through arch bridges with hangers have been built throughout the world. However, the structural collapse may happen due to the hanger's damage or failure if the bridge is not designed appropriately. In this paper, the structural robustness of the through arch bridges with vertical hangers are discussed and verified by an example. Based on this study, a few practical suggestions are put forward to achieve the structural robustness for the future through arch bridges' design.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2412-2417

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Information on http://news.163.com/photoview/00AN0001/14026.html

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http://www.news.cn

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/21/commonwealth-games-doubt-after-bridge-collapse/?page=all.

Google Scholar

[4] B.R. Ellingwood and D.O. Dusenberry: Building Design for Abnormal Loads and Progressive Collapse. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 20 (2005),pp.194-205

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00387.x

Google Scholar

[5] A.G. Vlassis, B.A. Izzuddin, A.Y. Elghazouli and D.A. Nethercot: Design Oriented Approach for Progressive Collapse Assessment of Steel Framed Buildings. Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) 16, No. 2(2006), pp.129-136.

DOI: 10.2749/101686606777962495

Google Scholar

[6] General Services Administration: Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects. (General Services Administration, USA, June 2003).

Google Scholar

[7] CEN. EN 1991-1-7: Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures: Part 1-7: Accidental Actions. (European Committee for Standardization, 2006).

Google Scholar

[8] C. Pearson and N. Delatte:Ronan Point Apartment Tower Collapse and its effect on Building Codes. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 19, No. 2 (2005), pp.172-177.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2005)19:2(172)

Google Scholar

[9] H. Gulvanessian and T. Vrouwenvelder: Robustness and the Eurocodes. Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) 16, No. 2(2006), pp.167-171

DOI: 10.2749/101686606777962396

Google Scholar

[10] ANSYS Software, Release 13.0, ANSYS, Inc., 2010.

Google Scholar

[11] MOHURD: Code for design of steel structures, GB50017-2003.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, China Planning Press: Beijing, 2003. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar