Performance of Urban Rainwater Retention by Green Roof: A Case Study of Jinan

Article Preview

Abstract:

Green roof can significantly reduce runoff volume and delay the duration of rainwater compared to a conventional roof; however there is insufficient research in China regarding rainwater retention performance. In this research, a comparison of a green roof with a conventional roof on rainwater retention is quantified. Results suggest that the specified sedum green roof delays the start and end time of runoff for 3 –13 and 4 –8 minutes. Artificial rainfall runoff retention ranged from 52.86% to 71% for the green roof. On the retention efficiency, potential 3141.77 ×104 m3 rainwater could be retained by urban green roof in Jinan. The green roof is demonstrated an optional measure to reduce the quantity of rainwater entering already overburdened city drainage systems with great huge economic and environmental benefits.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

295-299

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.J. Sailor: A Green Roof Model for Building Energy Simulation Programs (Portland State University, Portland 2008).

Google Scholar

[2] J.C. Berndtsson, T. Emilsson, L. Bengtsson: Science of the Total Environment Vol.1-3 (2006), pp.48-63.

Google Scholar

[3] D.J. Bliss, R.D. Neufeld, R.J. Ries: Environmental Engineering Science Vol.26 (2009), pp.407-418.

Google Scholar

[4] J.C. DeNardo , A.R. Jarrett, H.B. Manbeck, D.J. Beattie, and R.D. Berghage: Trans. ASAE Vol. 48(2005), pp.1491-1496.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.19181

Google Scholar

[5] N.D. VanWoert, D.B. Rowe, J.A. Andresen, C.L. Rugh, R.T. Fernandez, and L. Xiao: Journal of Environmental Quality Vol. 34(2005), pp.1036-1044.

DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0364

Google Scholar

[6] D.J. Beattie, R. Berghage, in Proceeding of 2nd North American Green Roof Conference: Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Toronto, Canada, pp.411-416, 2004.

Google Scholar