Optimizing the Step-Feed Ratio and Modeling the Effluents of Aerobic Tank with ASM1 in ECOSUNIDE Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The step feed model based on the Activated Sludge Model No.1 (ASM1) and the optimum model of the ammonia nitrogen (SNH) removal in wastewater were established. Four aeration tanks under the different step feed ratios were simulated by Matlab Simulink. The results show that single-feeding is conducive to the removal of readily biodegradable substrate (SS) and the growth of heterotrophic organisms (XBH), and to lower the biodegradable substrate (XS) at the same time. The SS, XS, and SNH concentrations are 1.36, 5.98, and 3.02 mg/L respectively in effluent. However, the step-feeding is conducive to the SNH removal, and the autotrophic bacteria (XBA) growth. Under the step feed ratio (25/25/25/25%), the SS, XS, and SNH concentrations are 2.64, 10.79, and 2.61 mg/L respectively. Under the optimum ratio (28.7/23.6/20.4/27.2%), step-feeding could further facilitate the removal of SNH and hinder the removal of organic matter, their concentrations are 2.70, 10.98, and 2.47 mg/L respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

526-530

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yanqiu Zhang; Jie Zhang; Aotian Xu, Ruogu Li. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology. 33-2(2004) , 197-204 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Ang Li, Yanqiu Zhang, Yan Li. China Water & Wastewater. 25-4(2009), 62-64 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Wei Wang, Shuying Wang, Yanan Sun. China Water & Wastewater. 23-21 (2007) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] V Krist. Gernaey, C M Mark van Loosdrecht, Mogens Henze, et al. Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 19 (2004), 763-783.

Google Scholar

[5] M Henze, W Gujer, T Mino. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, Scientific and Technical Report No. 9. IWA Publishing, London, (2002).

DOI: 10.2166/9781780402369

Google Scholar

[6] Vaiopoulou E, Aivasidis A. Chemosphere. 72(2008), 1062-1068.

Google Scholar

[7] S J Ge , Y Z Peng. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae. 29-12(2009) , 2465- 2470.

Google Scholar